Search for: "Amgen, Inc. v. Hoechst Marion Roussel, Inc." Results 21 - 40 of 41
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Apr 2011, 5:17 pm
Hoechst Marion Roussel, Inc., 314 F.3d 1313, 1331-33 (Fed. [read post]
1 Apr 2011, 12:42 pm by Lawrence B. Ebert
Hoechst Marion Roussel, Inc., 314 F.3d 1313, 1331-33 (Fed. [read post]
19 Feb 2011, 3:32 pm
Hoechst Marion Roussel, Inc., 314 F.3d 1313, 1326 (Fed. [read post]
18 Feb 2011, 4:11 pm by Lawrence B. Ebert
Hoechst Marion Roussel, Inc., 314 F.3d 1313, 1326 (Fed. [read post]
22 Aug 2010, 2:15 pm
Hoechst Marion Roussel, Inc., 314 F.3d 1313, 1357 (Fed. [read post]
20 Aug 2010, 5:46 pm by Lawrence B. Ebert
Hoechst Marion Roussel, Inc., 314 F.3d 1313, 1357 (Fed. [read post]
13 Apr 2010, 10:26 am
Hoechst Marion Roussel, Inc., 314 F.3d 1313, 1330 (Fed. [read post]
29 Jan 2010, 1:25 am
Hoechst Marion Roussel, Inc., 314 F.3d 1313, 1357 (Fed. [read post]
8 Dec 2009, 5:26 pm
Hoechst Marion Roussel, Inc., 314 F.3d 1313, 1330 (Fed. [read post]
8 Jun 2009, 12:37 am
As this court stated in Amgen Inc. v. [read post]
12 Dec 2008, 8:42 am
Hoechst Marion Roussel, Inc., 457 F.3d 1293, 1306-07 (Fed. [read post]
28 Oct 2008, 5:52 am
On this basis there was no infringement.* The prior art cited by ACS did not emcompass the invention described in Ancon's patent, so the challenge to its validity failed.The IPKat notes the judge's reliance on, among other decisions, that of the House of Lords in Kirin-Amgen Inc. v Hoechst Marion Roussel Ltd, in which Lord Hoffmann rewrote, clarified or invented the British law on claim construction, depending on how you read the law… [read post]
6 Oct 2008, 7:23 am
Hoechst Marion Roussel, Inc., 314 F.3d 1313, 1355-56 (Fed. [read post]
9 Jul 2007, 9:14 am
Hoechst Marion Roussel, Inc., 457 F.3d 1293, 1313 (Fed. [read post]
15 May 2007, 6:59 am
Hoechst Marion Roussel Inc. and Transkaryotic Therapies Inc., 06-1291. [read post]
27 Mar 2007, 3:29 pm
Hoechst Marion Roussel, Inc., et al. [read post]
27 Nov 2006, 5:18 am
Hoechst Marion Roussel (05-1157 ) - November 22, 2006(Petition for en banc rehearing denied)Since the Federal Circuit decided in Cybor Corp v. [read post]