Search for: "Amusements Enterprises, Inc."
Results 21 - 40
of 42
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 May 2012, 11:21 am
Inc, 506 A.2d 1100, 1108 (D.C 1986)(“[Dr. [read post]
21 May 2012, 4:36 pm
The rest of the 1,100 men, the lowly black-and-white stripes, must figure out how to amuse themselves. [read post]
10 May 2012, 6:35 am
Thomas and Sharie Davis are the owners of Davis Enterprises, a carnival and amusement park business. [read post]
8 Feb 2012, 2:46 am
I would think that the enterprises that claim legitimacy in rating lawyers (not to mention doctors and dentists these days) would want to protect their legitimacy from abuse and deceptive use. [read post]
4 Jan 2012, 11:42 pm
Apparently, it’s also very popular at least one bar — Full Circle Bar — in Brooklyn, NY, about which Skee-Ball, Inc. isn’t amused. [read post]
25 Oct 2011, 4:32 pm
(Elvis Presley Enterprises, Inc. v. [read post]
8 Jul 2011, 12:35 pm
The interplay between the trade mark act as well as the domain names on the basis of the trade mark includes name and in turn the domain name was for first witnessed by this court in the case of Yahoo Inc v. [read post]
2 Apr 2011, 6:23 am
Privacy was also an important issue at the ‘Enterprise Strategies’ conference. [read post]
19 Nov 2010, 5:06 pm
NBY Enterprises Inc.. [read post]
24 Oct 2010, 11:48 pm
Aqua Flora, Inc. et al. [read post]
8 May 2010, 6:53 pm
Harkins Amusement Enterprises Inc. et al. largely overturned a lower court’s dismissal of the case brought by Frederick Lindstrom, who has severe hearing loss, and Larry Wanger who is blind in one eye and has trouble seeing out of the other. [read post]
4 May 2010, 5:58 am
Harkins Amusement Enterprises Inc. et al. largely overturned a lower court’s dismissal of the case brought by Frederick Lindstrom, who has severe hearing loss, and Larry Wanger who is blind in one eye and has poor vision the other. [read post]
21 Dec 2009, 5:24 am
- Cassation Court’s criminal chamber orders destruction of 3,123 Abode of Chaos works of art – copyright questions (1709 Copyright Blog) Germany Federal Supreme Court: incidental introduction of new document and due process in opposition proceedings (EPLAW) Federal Supreme Court: Prior use right and contractual arrangements between inventor and alleged infringer (EPLAW) Hong Kong Giorgio Armani not amused by Giormani of Hong Kong (IP Dragon) India Madras… [read post]
17 Jul 2009, 11:33 am
JVW Enterprise, Inc. v. [read post]
3 Jul 2009, 5:22 am
In their 1934 book, The Modern Corporation and Private Property, noted authors Berle and Means characterized this relationship as one where: The stockholder is…left as a matter of law with little more than the loose expectation that a group of men, under a nominal duty to run the enterprise for his benefit and that of others like him, will actually observe the obligation. [2] I am not quite so pessimistic, however. [read post]
21 Mar 2009, 7:31 am
In 2001, plaintiff, Pooh-Bah Enterprises, Inc., brought suit, in the circuit court of Cook County, for declaratory and injunctive relief against the County. [read post]
23 Jan 2009, 1:00 am
(IP Dragon) Copycats in China: trains, planes and ... automobiles (IP Dragon) Denmark Copenhagen Maritime and Commercial Court rules Innocent Pictures ApS’ use of ‘Tivoli’ and ‘Tivoli Night’ in context of pornographic broadcasts infringes trade mark rights of Danish amusement park TIVOLI A/S (Class 46) Court finds minimal confusion in MINIMAL case (International Law Office) Europe ECJ: Promotional items do not qualify… [read post]
11 Jul 2008, 12:38 pm
Sega Enterprises Ltd. v. [read post]
28 Jul 2007, 7:12 am
This doctrine is explained in Playboy Enterprises, Inc. v. [read post]
22 Jul 2007, 9:03 pm
The Redstones currently control their investments through the family holding company, National Amusements Inc., a Delaware corporation. [read post]
