Search for: "Andrew J. Maxwell"
Results 21 - 40
of 60
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Sep 2009, 7:50 pm
. - Chicago attorney Patrick J. [read post]
31 Aug 2010, 4:45 pm
- Milwaukee attorney Anthony Chan of Quarles & Brady on the firm's blog, e-Discovery Bytes Only Five Days To Report Data Breach For Insurers And Agents In Connecticut - Glastonbury lawyer Kane Bennett of Raymond & Bennett LLC on his Connecticut Business Litigation Blog There Is a Statute of Limitations For Challenging Permits In Massachusetts (Or, We're Crazy Here, But Not That Crazy) - Boston attorney Seth Jaffe of Foley Hoag on the firm's blog, Law & The… [read post]
18 Nov 2013, 10:45 am
On Wednesday, 27 November 2013 [which is most definitely a Wednesday and not a Thursday, says Andrew J. [read post]
14 Jan 2015, 4:00 am
Anthony J. [read post]
6 Oct 2022, 8:47 am
The winds of change On 29 October 2021, Sir Andrew McFarlane, the President of the Family Division, published a Report entitled “Confidence and Confidentiality: Transparency in the Family Courts”. [read post]
21 Aug 2019, 1:09 pm
O'Connor's Pub)FRIDAY, NOVEMBER 22, 20198:30 AM – 10:00 AMPetitioning the President: James Madison, The Haitian Revolution, and a Resurgence of the International Slave Trade (Arlington Room)Chairs: Malick Ghachem, Massachusetts Institute of Technology (mghachem@mit.edu), Rebecca J Scott, University of Michigan (rjscott@umich.edu) and Darrell Meadows, Nation Historical Publications & Records… [read post]
14 Mar 2010, 11:04 pm
This, the brand-new 2010 edition, is published by Sweet & Maxwell (click here for details), and retails at a very reasonable £135. [read post]
22 Nov 2011, 1:19 am
Andrew Murray (Professor of Law at the London School of Economics) and Neil Wilkof (IPKat, co-author of Sweet & Maxwell's Trade Mark Licensing and editorial board member of JIPLP) argued for the motion, taking on Justine Pila (Fellow and Senior Law Tutor of St Catharine's College, Oxford) and Dominic Young (ex-director and chairman of the NLA), who argued against. [read post]
21 Dec 2006, 6:39 am
The IPKat notes that the Court was assisted by Pumfrey J's analysis in re Palmaz's European Patents (UK) [1999] RPC 47, where he describes the process of taking a feature of a preferred embodiment which lacks inventive content and then inserting it into a claim as "intermediate generalisation". [read post]
24 Jun 2011, 7:21 am
The venue is the Shailesh J. [read post]
10 Jan 2022, 4:01 pm
Newspapers Journalism and Regulation The BBC is launching an investigation after finding that an interview with Jeffrey Epstein’s former lawyer Alan Dershowitz, following the conviction of British socialite Ghislaine Maxwell, did not meet its editorial standards. [read post]
26 Feb 2008, 9:41 am
Walters, Cheryl J. [read post]
19 Dec 2011, 3:11 am
, Peter J. [read post]
29 May 2008, 7:47 am
. _________________________ Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Maxwell Wiley, J.), ... [read post]
30 May 2017, 3:26 am
The Court of Appeal ruled in favour of a Reuters journalist forcing the Government to release details of Andrew Lansley’s ministerial diary. [read post]
8 Dec 2008, 9:45 am
IMPRINT London : Sweet & Maxwell, 2007. [read post]
28 May 2017, 4:03 pm
The Court of Appeal ruled in favour of a Reuters journalist forcing the Government to release details of Andrew Lansley’s ministerial diary. [read post]
20 May 2022, 6:30 am
Herlihy, Wachtell, Lipton, Rosen & Katz, on Sunday, May 15, 2022 Tags: Acquisition agreements, Equity securities, Market conditions, Mergers & acquisitions, Risk, Risk management, Termination Freeze-Out of Minority Not “Entirely Fair”—Salem Cellular Posted by Gail Weinstein, Andrew J. [read post]
20 May 2022, 6:30 am
Herlihy, Wachtell, Lipton, Rosen & Katz, on Sunday, May 15, 2022 Tags: Acquisition agreements, Equity securities, Market conditions, Mergers & acquisitions, Risk, Risk management, Termination Freeze-Out of Minority Not “Entirely Fair”—Salem Cellular Posted by Gail Weinstein, Andrew J. [read post]
22 May 2016, 4:05 pm
On 18 May 2016, Nicol J heard an application in the case of Johnson v Ministry of Justice. [read post]
