Search for: "Angel v. Phillips"
Results 21 - 40
of 148
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Jun 2020, 12:00 am
In Phillips v. [read post]
15 Jun 2020, 3:00 pm
In Phillips v. [read post]
5 Jan 2012, 11:19 am
By Michael Kiely and Phillip Tate On December 29, 2011, legislation to dissolve all redevelopment agencies became effective when the California Supreme Court released its opinion in California Redevelopment Association v. [read post]
15 Mar 2014, 5:12 pm
Yesterday we concluded the Third Annual UCLA Cyber Crime Moot Court Competition in Los Angeles. [read post]
16 Mar 2018, 11:26 am
In 1995, CJLF filed an amicus brief in Gallo v. [read post]
2 Jul 2010, 2:47 pm
Other Superior Court judges named Wednesday are: Mark V. [read post]
3 Aug 2012, 1:18 pm
Craig Allen, 39 years old, and Phillip Walters, 56 years old, are facing criminal charges and surrendered at the California Superior Court upon the issuance of arrest warrants, DUI attorneys and the Los Angeles County district attorney’s office. [read post]
24 Aug 2018, 4:32 am
For the Los Angeles Times, David Savage reports on how Kavanaugh’s work on independent counsel Kenneth Starr’s investigation that led to impeachment charges against President Bill Clinton “could influence a future congressional debate if Trump faces impeachment. [read post]
18 Sep 2009, 8:40 am
Although the United States Supreme Court ruled in Baze v. [read post]
24 Mar 2016, 9:13 am
Minnesota, Birchfield v. [read post]
4 Oct 2011, 9:39 am
By Michael Kiely and Phillip Tate True to their promise, the California Redevelopment Association, or CRA, and the California League of Cities, or CLC, petitioned the California Supreme Court on July 15, 2011 for a writ of mandate challenging the Legislature's adoption of ABX1 26, providing for elimination of California redevelopment agencies (RDAs), and ABX1 27, exempting from elimination any RDA that agrees to make its share of a $1.7 billion voluntary contribution of its revenues… [read post]
4 Oct 2011, 9:39 am
By Michael Kiely and Phillip Tate True to their promise, the California Redevelopment Association, or CRA, and the California League of Cities, or CLC, petitioned the California Supreme Court on July 15, 2011 for a writ of mandate challenging the Legislature's adoption of ABX1 26, providing for elimination of California redevelopment agencies (RDAs), and ABX1 27, exempting from elimination any RDA that agrees to make its share of a $1.7 billion voluntary contribution of its revenues… [read post]
13 Jan 2016, 7:33 pm
Supreme Court in Hurst v. [read post]
14 Sep 2011, 11:50 am
Phillip J. [read post]
28 Jan 2019, 7:17 am
In an op-ed for Los Angeles Times, James Phillips and John Yoo argue that “[t]o ensure the equal treatment of constitutional rights, the court should establish a test fully rooted in the original understanding of the Constitution and the Bill of Rights. [read post]
5 Jun 2008, 8:51 pm
” This recalls Professor Mel Nimmer’s famous argument in Cohen v. [read post]
23 Feb 2012, 7:34 am
Holder for this blog, while Kelly Phillips Erb does the same at Forbes. [read post]
1 Sep 2016, 2:38 am
“Mientras que nuestros corazones están con Dugard, la ley no”, explica la determinación, según reportó el periódico Los Angeles Times. [read post]
22 Jun 2020, 11:22 am
The majority opinion in Bostock identified three decisions that also expanded the meaning of sex discrimination under Title VII: – In Phillips v. [read post]
10 Jul 2011, 5:58 am
Walter Cronkite clip on Roe v. [read post]
