Search for: "Apple Inc. v. Motorola Mobility, Inc."
Results 21 - 40
of 103
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Jun 2012, 12:15 pm
In one of many patent battles in the mobile phone war, Apple and Motorola squared off in Eastern Illinois, with stellar law firms as representation, naturally. [read post]
15 May 2013, 8:57 am
In the Matter of Motorola Mobility LLC and Google Inc., FTC File No. 121-0120, Decision and Order, 2013 WL 124100, at *10-11. [read post]
6 Dec 2013, 12:48 am
Mattel, Inc. v. [read post]
22 Dec 2016, 4:20 am
Apple alleges that the intended purpose of Motorola's promises was to induce reliance and that Motorola "knew or should have reasonably expected that this promise would induce sellers of mobile wireless devices, like Apple, to develop products compliant with the relevant standards. [read post]
6 Sep 2015, 2:51 am
The action opposing the grant of the patent was brought by Motorola Mobility. [read post]
27 Aug 2012, 10:40 am
Motorola Mobility, U.S. [read post]
31 May 2013, 4:59 am
After Microsoft felt forced for procedural reasons to add Google Inc. to a German patent infringement action originally brought only against its Motorola Mobility subsidiary, a Microsoft v. [read post]
Apple filing reveals Samsung recently reduced its 2.4% royalty demand for standard-essential patents
5 Apr 2013, 10:17 am
Complaint, Ericsson Inc. v. [read post]
12 Nov 2013, 10:33 pm
Here's Google's notice of appeal (click on the image to enlarge or read the text below the image):NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that Motorola, Inc., Motorola Mobility, Inc. and General Instrument Corporation (collectively, "Motorola"), Defendants and Plaintiffs/Counterclaim Defendants in the above-captioned case, appeal to the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit from the Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 54(b) Judgment of the District… [read post]
6 Jul 2013, 12:39 pm
It notes toward the end that "Apple's unique operating system at least sets its mobile devices and computers apart". [read post]
7 Oct 2021, 4:20 am
Apple, Inc., GPNE alleged Apple infringed patents that it claimed were essential to the GPRS, EDGE, and/or LTE cellular standards. [read post]
28 May 2007, 11:26 pm
Koch Oil Co. of Tex., Inc., 351 F.3d 636, 640 n. 4 (5th Cir.2003) (applying the "plaintiff's viewpoint" rule); Ericsson GE Mobile Communications, Inc. v. [read post]
9 Jul 2013, 6:31 am
Sept. 12, 2007) (granting stay requested by wireless carriers and handset manufacturers);Dynatec Int'l, Inc. v. [read post]
28 Dec 2012, 2:43 am
The Apple-Samsung award needs to be adjusted here and there, but the CMU-Marvell award must simply be tossed or slashed in order to protect the innovation economy against patent unreasonableness.The cross-appeal of Judge Posner's Apple v. [read post]
19 Aug 2011, 12:01 am
Inc. v. [read post]
5 Feb 2012, 7:55 am
Florida filing latest in Motorola v Apple war Nothing warms patent lawyers' cockles during these freezing winter months than more mobile patent disputes. [read post]
12 Dec 2011, 6:01 am
" Motorola Mobility, Inc. v. [read post]
4 Apr 2014, 10:43 pm
Apple acquired Siri, Inc. on April 28, 2010. [read post]
31 May 2012, 10:56 am
By way of background, the investigation is based on an October 2, 2010 complaint filed by Motorola Mobility, Inc. [read post]
12 Jun 2016, 2:43 pm
" That's a major win for Samsung and everyone with a balanced position on the issue.I'll now point to all of the amicus briefs filed in the first round (I'll do the same when Apple's backers file later this summer) and sum up what I consider to be their key points.Pro-Samsung brief #1: The Internet Association, The Software & Information Industry Association, Dell, eBay, Facebook, Garmin, Google, HP, Lenovo, Motorola Mobility, Newegg,… [read post]
