Search for: "Application of Interstate Power Co."
Results 21 - 40
of 310
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Aug 2017, 9:17 am
In July 2017, the California Supreme Court determined the federal Interstate Commerce Commission Termination Act of 1995 (49 U.S.C. [read post]
29 Jun 2011, 4:40 pm
UPDATE #3: Co-blogger Jonathan Adler makes some related points here. [read post]
26 Jul 2018, 5:10 am
§ 249(a)(2), and requires proof of an interstate commerce nexus.) [read post]
25 Oct 2022, 10:46 am
Further, Chapter 324 purported to order the Commission to transfer to the New Jersey’s Treasurer all funds the Commission held that were “applicable to” New Jersey. [read post]
21 Apr 2023, 4:21 am
Thus, in order to qualify for registration of a mark, "one must sell or transport goods bearing the mark such that the sale or transport would be subject to Congress’s power under the Commerce Clause, which includes its power to regulate interstate commerce. [read post]
5 Apr 2012, 11:40 am
He's already (co)written it -- or at least the stare decisis part. [read post]
1 Feb 2011, 1:35 pm
The Commerce Clause gives Congress the power to regulate commerce between nations as well as between states. [read post]
22 Feb 2018, 6:00 am
Other judges on the Fourth Circuit resolved the case entirely on statutory grounds through the application of the avoidance canon. [read post]
15 Mar 2017, 9:00 am
The topics considered will include limitations placed upon state and federal regulatory authority by the Due Process Clauses of the Fifth and Fourteenth Amendments, the Equal Protection Clause, the Tenth Amendment, and the Dormant Commerce Clause, as well as restrictions on and changes in the scope of the federal powers to tax, to spend, and to regulate interstate commerce. [read post]
24 Apr 2017, 8:00 am
The topics considered will include limitations placed upon state and federal regulatory authority by the Due Process Clauses of the Fifth and Fourteenth Amendments, the Equal Protection Clause, the Tenth Amendment, and the Dormant Commerce Clause, as well as restrictions on and changes in the scope of the federal powers to tax, to spend, and to regulate interstate commerce. [read post]
7 Dec 2015, 12:40 pm
” This formula reflected the participating governments’ status as co-equal semi-sovereignties. [read post]
14 Feb 2014, 12:00 pm
Visciotti and its progeny, by finding a state court’s application of Beck v. [read post]
12 Mar 2024, 2:40 pm
Co. v. [read post]
11 May 2012, 10:31 am
Eaton Co., 234 F.2d 633 (2d Cir. 1956)), following the seminal Supreme Court decision in Steele v. [read post]
24 Feb 2024, 6:30 am
It explores that enduring subject by focusing on issues involving intergovernmental tax immunity, congressional regulatory power, the dormant Commerce Clause, and the law-making authority of the federal judiciary. [read post]
11 Mar 2016, 11:52 am
” Palermo Land Co., Inc. v. [read post]
28 Aug 2015, 9:35 am
Some cases, like D’Oench, Duhme & Co. v. [read post]
18 Dec 2021, 9:54 am
" The emergency rule "is not a novel expansion of OSHA’s power; it is an existing application of authority to a novel and dangerous worldwide pandemic. [read post]
24 May 2007, 10:40 am
At bottom, preemption is about power. [read post]
26 Jun 2017, 8:26 am
“Affiliation” works well for the facts of the case, but perhaps not so well for broader applications. [read post]
