Search for: "Application of Merton"
Results 21 - 40
of 47
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Jul 2012, 4:17 am
Supreme Court RT (Zimbabwe) & Ors v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2012] UKSC 38 (25 July 2012) Perry & Ors v Serious Organised Crime Agency [2012] UKSC 35 (25 July 2012) Hewage v Grampian Health Board [2012] UKSC 37 (25 July 2012) T (Children), Re [2012] UKSC 36 (25 July 2012) Solihull Metropolitan Borough Council v Hickin [2012] UKSC 39 (25 July 2012) Court of Appeal (Civil Division) EJ (Afghanistan) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2012] EWCA Civ 1013 (25 July… [read post]
11 May 2009, 11:38 am
Since the system involves the decision being made by the LA and the Home Office accepting its decision provided that it is Merton compliant [R(B) v London Borough of Merton [2003] EWHC 1689 (Admin)], it seems to me that it is essential that the Home Office receives a full report. [read post]
26 Apr 2023, 3:02 am
Z o.o. and others v Jakubowski and others, heard 28th February 2023 Thaler v Comptroller-General of Patents, Designs and Trade Marks, heard 2nd March 2023 The Manchester Ship Canal Company Ltd v United Utilites Water Ltd No 2, heard 6th March 2023 London Borough of Merton Council v Nuffield Health Ltd, heard 7th March 2023 R (on the application of Palmer) v Northern Derbyshire Magistrates Court and another, heard 8th March 2023 R (on the… [read post]
17 Apr 2023, 2:19 am
Z o.o. and others v Jakubowski and others, heard 28th February 2023 Thaler v Comptroller-General of Patents, Designs and Trade Marks, heard 2nd March 2023 The Manchester Ship Canal Company Ltd v United Utilites Water Ltd No 2, heard 6th March 2023 London Borough of Merton Council v Nuffield Health Ltd, heard 7th March 2023 R (on the application of Palmer) v Northern Derbyshire Magistrates Court and another, heard 8th March 2023 R (on the… [read post]
20 Mar 2023, 2:13 am
Z o.o. and others v Jakubowski and others, heard 28th February 2023 Thaler v Comptroller-General of Patents, Designs and Trade Marks, heard 2nd March 2023 The Manchester Ship Canal Company Ltd v United Utilites Water Ltd No 2, heard 6th March 2023 London Borough of Merton Council v Nuffield Health Ltd, heard 7th March 2023 R (on the application of Palmer) v Northern Derbyshire Magistrates Court and another, heard 8th March 2023 R (on the… [read post]
12 Mar 2010, 6:58 am
I’m hoping people will contribute and that we can have, as Mrs Merton used to say on her show “a heated debate”. [read post]
27 Mar 2023, 2:47 am
Z o.o. and others v Jakubowski and others, heard 28th February 2023 Thaler v Comptroller-General of Patents, Designs and Trade Marks, heard 2nd March 2023 The Manchester Ship Canal Company Ltd v United Utilites Water Ltd No 2, heard 6th March 2023 London Borough of Merton Council v Nuffield Health Ltd, heard 7th March 2023 R (on the application of Palmer) v Northern Derbyshire Magistrates Court and another, heard 8th March 2023 R (on the… [read post]
15 May 2023, 1:52 am
Z o.o. and others v Jakubowski and others, heard 28th February 2023 Thaler v Comptroller-General of Patents, Designs and Trade Marks, heard 2nd March 2023 The Manchester Ship Canal Company Ltd v United Utilites Water Ltd No 2, heard 6th March 2023 London Borough of Merton Council v Nuffield Health Ltd, heard 7th March 2023 R (on the application of Palmer) v Northern Derbyshire Magistrates Court and another, heard 8th March 2023 R (on the… [read post]
9 May 2023, 1:58 am
Z o.o. and others v Jakubowski and others, heard 28th February 2023 Thaler v Comptroller-General of Patents, Designs and Trade Marks, heard 2nd March 2023 The Manchester Ship Canal Company Ltd v United Utilites Water Ltd No 2, heard 6th March 2023 London Borough of Merton Council v Nuffield Health Ltd, heard 7th March 2023 R (on the application of Palmer) v Northern Derbyshire Magistrates Court and another, heard 8th March 2023 R (on the… [read post]
13 Mar 2023, 2:44 am
Z o.o. and others v Jakubowski and others, heard 28th February 2023 Thaler v Comptroller-General of Patents, Designs and Trade Marks, heard 2nd March 2023 The Manchester Ship Canal Company Ltd v United Utilites Water Ltd No 2, heard 6th March 2023 London Borough of Merton Council v Nuffield Health Ltd, heard 7th March 2023 R (on the application of Palmer) v Northern Derbyshire Magistrates Court and another, heard 8th March 2023 R (on the… [read post]
14 Jun 2010, 1:50 pm
Good work by Merton Law Centre there. [read post]
14 Jun 2010, 1:50 pm
Good work by Merton Law Centre there. [read post]
15 Mar 2021, 4:44 am
The test There was a dispute as to the applicable test. [read post]
9 Oct 2019, 7:21 am
The Court of Appeal’s application of the “manifestly without reasonable foundation” test when considering justification is also questionable. [read post]
25 Jun 2014, 4:00 am
This application raises novel questions about the Court’s authority to make such an order against a global internet service provider. [2] Although the plaintiffs seek an order against Google Inc. and Google Canada Corporation, there is no evidence that Google Canada Corporation is involved in the search services the plaintiffs seek to enjoin. [read post]
21 Oct 2018, 10:29 am
” Brief at 217& n.11.11 The AAAS and the NAS thus saw a real, substantial threat in countenancing expert witnesess who proffered “putatively scientific evidence that does not in fact reflect the application of scientific principles. [read post]
12 Feb 2018, 2:48 am
” [29] “[I]t is neither necessary nor appropriate to treat Caparo Industries v Dickman [1990] 2 AC 605 as requiring the application of its familiar three-stage examination afresh to every action brought. [read post]
22 May 2020, 6:02 am
Merton (MIT) and Arun Muralidhar (AlphaEngine Global Investment Solutions), on Wednesday, May 20, 2020 Tags: Bonds, Cash flows, Pension funds, Retirement plans The Right Timing for NOL Rights Plan Adoption Posted by William L. [read post]
29 Aug 2008, 1:00 pm
In fact, data sharing performs such a key role2 that without a commons based on publicly shared data, scientific progress would surely suffer.3 In addition, data forms the foundation for downstream commercial applications aimed at privatizing the fruits of the scientific enterprise.4 Yet, despite their importance, data ownership rules are subject to a unique, inchoate IP regime which is neither copyright, patent, nor trademark. [read post]
29 May 2012, 6:53 am
The self-reinforcing “Matthew Effect” described by Robert Merton takes hold: to those who already have much, more is given. [read post]
