Search for: "Arista Music" Results 21 - 40 of 263
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Nov 2012, 6:42 am by Terry Hart
The House Judiciary Committee will be holding a hearing on music licensing today at 11:30EST. [read post]
10 Oct 2012, 10:31 am by Aisling
On October 4, 2012, the Federal Trade Commission (“FTC”) announced that it had settled charges against Arista Arena, LLC (“Arista”), the operator of fan websites for pop music artists including Justin Bieber, Selena Gomez, Demi Lovato and Rihanna. [read post]
10 Oct 2012, 10:31 am by Aisling
On October 4, 2012, the Federal Trade Commission (“FTC”) announced that it had settled charges against Arista Arena, LLC (“Arista”), the operator of fan websites for pop music artists including Justin Bieber, Selena Gomez, Demi Lovato and Rihanna. [read post]
12 Sep 2012, 9:07 am by Matthew Pomy
Sony BMG, Arista Records, Interscope Records, UMG Recordings, Capitol Records and Warner Bros. [read post]
12 Sep 2012, 7:41 am by James R. Marsh
The companies involved in the litigation include Capitol Records, Inc., Sony BMG Music Entertainment, Arista Records LLC, InterscopeRecords, Warner Bros. [read post]
9 Apr 2012, 9:17 am by Ray Beckerman
All of the defendants' dismissal motions were denied from the bench on April 6th, in Arista Music v. [read post]
23 Oct 2011, 5:56 am by Lawrence B. Ebert
Then started Arista; Scott English (Brandy). [read post]
28 Sep 2011, 7:00 am by Daniel Kershen
This figure, Elvis’s estate claim, is “conspicuously disproportionate” to the amount that Arista have earned with the emergence of downloads, ringtones and apps featuring the King’s music produced prior to 1973. [read post]
26 Sep 2011, 4:42 am by Marie Louise
(Spicy IP) Delhi HC: Issuing interim orders under s.31 Copyright Act: Music Broadcast v Super Cassette (Spicy IP)   Israel Cautionary trademark tale concerning car wash business: Gilad Binyamin vs. [read post]
23 Jun 2011, 3:08 am by Woodrow Pollack
Reed, 173 F.3d 736, 740 (9th Cir. 1999); Polar Music, 714 F.2d at 1571; Ligotti v. [read post]