Search for: "Asbestos Defendants (B P)" Results 21 - 40 of 83
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 May 2020, 9:12 am by Benjamin Mitchel and Philip R. Stein
The jury rejected defendant’s arguments that a direct physical loss does not exist absent airborne asbestos and that a sample taken in one area of a building does not prove direct physical loss to the whole building. [read post]
16 Mar 2011, 9:15 am by Schachtman
  For instance, a third factor C could be causing both A and B. [read post]
11 Aug 2020, 2:48 am by Schachtman
In addition to now explicitly raising a government contractor defense,[8] the defendants have carefully marshaled the evidence of Navy knowledge to show that the third condition of DeVries must necessarily fail: the manufacturer had ample reason to believe that the product’s users will realize the relevant danger.[9] [1]  DeVries, 139 S.Ct. at 997 (Gorsuch, J., dissenting) (quoting from Restatement (Third) of Torts: Products Liability § 5, Comment b, p. 132… [read post]
18 Jul 2014, 11:55 am
Lake Asbestos of Quebec, Ltd., 1986 WL 69060, at *5-6 (N.D. [read post]
14 Sep 2010, 9:34 am
Along his way across the desert however, defendant "B" stole the desert traveler's water bottle. [read post]
29 Nov 2012, 1:23 pm by Bexis
DuPont de Nemours & Co., 909 P.2d 1, 10 (N.M. [read post]
23 Jun 2014, 12:57 pm by Schachtman
Take for example, asbestosis, a diffuse interstitial lung disease caused by chronic, excessive inhalation of asbestos. [read post]
18 Dec 2022, 3:52 pm by admin
  There are, of course, other target defendants in this litigation, and the actual case count is likely higher. [read post]
7 Apr 2010, 3:44 pm by admin
The following is a summary review of articles from all over the nation concerning environmental law settlements, decisions, regulatory actions and lawsuits filed during the past week. [read post]
13 Jul 2010, 6:30 am by @ErikJHeels
(Swampscott, MA) Allstate Asbestos Abatement Inc. [read post]
7 Jun 2020, 1:17 am by Schachtman
  Indeed, contend Defendants, these tests and diagnoses were not by treating physicians licensed in Utah, but by a physician who traveled to Utah with the sole purpose of generating asbestos claims at motels. [read post]