Search for: "Attorney General v. Ware" Results 21 - 40 of 76
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Apr 2012, 4:00 am by Terry Hart
On Thursday, the Second Circuit Court of Appeals decided Viacom v. [read post]
21 Dec 2017, 7:09 am
The EU General Court held that neither of Red bull’s registrations was valid, not on grounds of distinctiveness, but because they do not fit the requirements of a trade mark – as the marks were not sufficiently preciseLimoges porcelain now protected by French GI schemeFellow blogger (1709 Blog) and attorney (Fidal), Marie-Andrée Weiss, explains the details of the new French geographical indication (GI) scheme for Limoges porcelain.BREAKING NEWS - CJEU… [read post]
4 Jul 2021, 2:07 pm by Russell Knight
Evid. 611(c) “Generally, it is improper to lead witnesses except on cross-examination” People v. [read post]
29 May 2018, 10:19 am by Gritsforbreakfast
After all, bad apples spoil barrels.)Burkhart said IAC generally boils down to two issues: "The no body problem and the warm body problem. [read post]
4 Jan 2010, 3:23 am
(Spicy IP) Sanctity of Section 21 Patents Act (Spicy IP) ‘Abandoning’ legal fogginess: A proposal for patent clarity – section 21 Patents Act (Spicy IP) Court gives nod to patent for image on flowers: Speaking Roses International Inc v Controller-General Of Patents and Anr. [read post]
20 Jul 2009, 2:00 am
(PatLit)   United States US General House approves USPTO funding bill (Managing Intellectual Property) US measures to strengthen trade enforcement (Intellectual Property Watch)   US Patents Peer-to-patent project set on hold. [read post]
26 Aug 2010, 8:19 am
The suit began in October of 2000, and ECUSA was named as a defendant.The next triennial budget was adopted at General Convention 2003, which saw the confirmation of the election of V. [read post]
12 May 2011, 7:57 pm by Lyle Denniston
California’s state Attorney General, Kamala D. [read post]
1 Jun 2023, 2:47 pm by Shea Denning
Waring, 364 N.C. 443 (2010), and requires only that the defendant produce evidence sufficient to permit the trial court to draw an inference that discrimination has occurred, see Johnson v. [read post]
17 Dec 2015, 12:47 pm by Rick St. Hilaire
Officials simultaneously seized evidence from the Markell’s home as well as their business, Silk Roads Design Gallery.The museum raids generated three published criminal cases:United States v. [read post]