Search for: "B OF A v. CHEEK"
Results 21 - 40
of 114
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Apr 2021, 5:20 pm
Under G.S. 14-72(b)(6), a defendant is eligible to be punished for habitual larceny when the defendant commits a larceny after having been convicted of larceny on four previous occasions. [read post]
12 Apr 2021, 7:05 am
Cheek, March 22, 2021, per curiam). [read post]
24 Feb 2021, 9:11 am
This logic was followed by the U.S. courts in Monsanto v. [read post]
3 Apr 2020, 12:00 am
Part V addresses three arguments against universal mask wearing. [read post]
8 Mar 2020, 9:01 pm
It nonetheless arrived with a jolt: One of America’s most distinguished jurists, Jack B. [read post]
6 Feb 2020, 7:01 pm
State v. [read post]
25 Jan 2020, 9:05 pm
V. [read post]
13 Dec 2019, 5:30 am
In Maryland v. [read post]
2 Oct 2019, 9:20 am
Cheeks, __ N.C. [read post]
14 May 2019, 10:57 am
See, e.g., State v. [read post]
2 Apr 2019, 1:05 am
The shape of the head and snout is almost identical in both signs, and so are the ears, cheeks, eyes, nostrils, and smiley mouth.There are, however, some visual differences, including: clothes, colours used, and word elements below the signs. [read post]
24 Mar 2019, 7:47 pm
B. [read post]
18 Feb 2019, 3:08 am
In Bar-Levy v. 35-33 36th Street Corp. [read post]
18 Nov 2018, 7:12 pm
But see Cheek v. [read post]
18 Nov 2018, 7:12 pm
But see Cheek v. [read post]
22 Jul 2018, 4:09 pm
The Legal Cheek blog has a report of the hearing and there was also a report in the Guardian. [read post]
19 Jul 2018, 6:10 am
The Third Circuit recently issued a fascinating sexual harassment opinion in Minarsky v. [read post]
21 May 2018, 3:30 am
In the Second Circuit, there is a case called Cheeks v. [read post]
21 May 2018, 3:30 am
In the Second Circuit, there is a case called Cheeks v. [read post]
25 Jan 2018, 9:00 pm
Instead of compelling testimony through its subpoena and contempt powers, it has meekly turned the other cheek to bald-faced evasions and highly dubious assertions of privilege.This congressional timidity is especially hard to fathom given the GOP’s narrow margin in the Senate. [read post]
