Search for: "BOARD OF ED. v. JACOBS"
Results 21 - 40
of 82
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Jun 2019, 3:58 am
” At the Duke Center for Firearms Law’s Second Thoughts blog, Jacob Charles looks at the implications of Rehaif v. [read post]
24 May 2019, 3:01 pm
She had concerns the Chamber had not taken sufficient steps to address the financial concerns raised by Bentley and that Carter's letter to board members "gloss[ed] over financial irregularities and the declining membership numbers. [read post]
21 May 2019, 11:57 pm
Irwin Jacobs (Qualcomm Co-Founder), Steve Mollenkopf (Qualcomm CEO), and Dr. [read post]
3 May 2019, 1:43 pm
Look at expected uses v. unexpected uses? [read post]
25 Apr 2019, 11:23 am
Fang G, Araujo V, Guerrant RL. (1991). [read post]
6 Mar 2019, 4:04 am
Jeremy Dys weighs in at The Daily Wire on Monday’s cert denial in Morris County Board of Chosen Freeholders v. [read post]
4 Mar 2019, 10:55 am
The fifth board of Appeal rejected the request for invaliditation of the Polo/Lauren Logo as it was based only upon an industrial design right which ceased to be valid due to its not renewal.In CJEU: "EZMIX" devoid of distinctive character and descriptive for software used in music production Nedim Malovic reports on the CJEU's decision in C-48/18, underlying that once again the CJEU made it cleat that only decisions on point of law may be subject to appeal to the Court.If… [read post]
20 Feb 2019, 2:13 pm
Jeffries Homes Housing Project, 306 Mich 638, 647-48; 11 NW2d 272 (1943); Grand Rapids Bd of Ed v Baczewski, 340 Mich 265, 270-71; 65 NW2d 810 (1954); Dep’t of Conservation v Connor, 316 Mich 565, 576-78; 25 NW2d 619 (1947). 9 See Chicago, Detroit, etc v Jacobs, 225 Mich 677; 196 NW 621 (1924); Michigan Air Line Ry v Barnes, 44 Mich 222; 6 NW 651 (1880); Toledo, etc R Co v Dunlap, 47 Mich 456; 11 NW 271 (1882); Detroit, etc R… [read post]
6 Feb 2019, 6:12 am
Another interesting decision from the Fourth Board of Appeal concerned a trade mark found to conflict with Beats figurative EU trade marks: Beats secures trade mark victory with EUIPO Fourth Board of Appeal. [read post]
18 Sep 2018, 2:35 pm
My amicus brief with Stephen Sachs in Franchise Tax Board v. [read post]
13 Dec 2017, 9:36 am
Co. v. [read post]
13 Dec 2017, 9:36 am
Co. v. [read post]
5 Dec 2017, 11:40 am
She is co-author, with English Barristers, Richard Jacobs QC and Paul Stanley QC, of Liability Insurance in International Arbitration: The Bermuda Form (Hart Publishing, 2d ed. 2011) (“The Bermuda Form”), which won the 2012 Book Prize of the British Insurance Law Association for outstanding contributions to the literature on insurance coverage. [read post]
5 Dec 2017, 11:40 am
She is co-author, with English Barristers, Richard Jacobs QC and Paul Stanley QC, of Liability Insurance in International Arbitration: The Bermuda Form (Hart Publishing, 2d ed. 2011) (“The Bermuda Form”), which won the 2012 Book Prize of the British Insurance Law Association for outstanding contributions to the literature on insurance coverage. [read post]
20 Nov 2017, 9:57 am
She is co-author, with English Barristers, Richard Jacobs QC and Paul Stanley QC, of Liability Insurance in International Arbitration: The Bermuda Form (Hart Publishing, 2d ed. 2011) (“The Bermuda Form”), which won the 2012 Book Prize of the British Insurance Law Association for outstanding contributions to the literature on insurance coverage. [read post]
15 Nov 2017, 10:12 am
She is co-author, with English Barristers, Richard Jacobs QC and Paul Stanley QC, of Liability Insurance i [read post]
15 Nov 2017, 10:12 am
She is co-author, with English Barristers, Richard Jacobs QC and Paul Stanley QC, of Liability Insurance i [read post]
13 Nov 2017, 9:12 am
For example, the New York Insurance Law specifically provides that evidence relating to other “similarly situated” policyholders is relevant to the issue of the materiality of an alleged misrepresentation in the policy application.5 As exemplified by the New York Court of Appeals in Belt Painting v. [read post]
13 Nov 2017, 9:12 am
For example, the New York Insurance Law specifically provides that evidence relating to other “similarly situated” policyholders is relevant to the issue of the materiality of an alleged misrepresentation in the policy application.5 As exemplified by the New York Court of Appeals in Belt Painting v. [read post]
18 Sep 2017, 2:42 am
KSR v. [read post]
