Search for: "BOARD OF REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN" Results 21 - 40 of 86
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Feb 2007, 8:33 am
" The court rejected arguments by the University of Michigan Board of Regents, Wayne State University, Washtenaw County, Ingham County, and the City of Ann Arbor, holding that their recognition of domestic partnership agreements by employee and same-sex partners violates the constitutional prohibition against the recognition of nonmarital unions. [read post]
8 Nov 2023, 3:36 pm by Jacob Wirz
Board of Regents of Univ. of Okla., 468 U.S. 85 (1984). [read post]
28 Jan 2015, 8:36 am by Eric Goldman
Additional cases have been filed by FIRE against Texas Tech University, Iowa State University, Western Michigan University, the University of Hawaii, and Ohio University. [read post]
26 Jun 2015, 11:54 am by Will Field
Protest against the California Supreme Court’s decision in Bakke, Los Angeles, May 7, 1977 On June 26, 1978, the Supreme Court ruled in Regents of the University of California v. [read post]
26 Jun 2018, 2:54 am by NCC Staff
On June 26, 1978, the Supreme Court ruled in Regents of the University of California v. [read post]
7 Jul 2011, 5:56 am by Aaron Lindstrom
Regents of the University of Michigan, this provision of the Michigan Constitution impermissibly restructured the political process governing admissions policies at state schools. [read post]
29 Jun 2018, 12:31 pm by Theodore Shaw
Supreme Court Justice Anthony Kennedy’s announced retirement came one day short of the 40th anniversary of Board of Regents of the University of California v. [read post]
27 Feb 2010, 7:49 pm by Matthew Nelson
State Farm Mutual Auto Insurance Co., No. 139582, pending decision in University of Michigan Board of Regents v. [read post]
9 Oct 2015, 9:30 pm by Dan Ernst
Donaldson), written by David Adler, President of the Sun Valley Institute, who is writing a book about the case.Via Indian Country Today: “The University of Oklahoma Board of Regents has named Dr. [read post]
18 Oct 2018, 9:01 pm by Vikram David Amar and Jason Mazzone
Bollinger, the 2003 case upholding the University of Michigan Law School’s carefully tailored race-conscious admissions program, is instructive. [read post]
10 Sep 2013, 9:58 am by Michael F. Smith
  As even the universities acknowledge, all authority over them under the Michigan Constitution ultimately resides with the people. [read post]
11 Oct 2011, 12:27 pm by Stephen Wermiel
After the Court narrowly permitted the use of race in admissions by a splintered five-four decision in 1978 in Regents of the University of California v. [read post]
9 Mar 2010, 5:45 am by Richard Oppenheim
According to the complaint, The University's Board of Regents has been unable to set admission policies that include ethnicity and race, as well as gender as factors. [read post]
1 Feb 2011, 5:19 pm by Adrian Lurssen
Regents of the University of California, et al. - Motion to Dismiss Complaint for Lack of Jurisdiction ... [read post]
29 Jun 2023, 12:55 pm by Scott Bomboy
The Supreme Court’s precedents on affirmative action dated back to 1978, when a divided Court came to a mixed decision in Regents of the University of California v. [read post]
5 Sep 2013, 10:23 am by Ken White
Penn of Michigan State University or Erik Loomis of the University of Rhode Island, readers argue about whether taxpayer-funded public university professors should or can be fired for their speech. [read post]
5 Mar 2010, 7:33 pm by Jason Greis
Jim is a graduate of Albion College and received his master’s degree in health services administration from the School of Public Health at the University of Michigan in Ann Arbor. [read post]
4 Oct 2018, 9:01 pm by Vikram David Amar and Jason Mazzone
Supreme Court has in recent decades frowned on racial floors or quotas under so-called strict scrutiny, in cases such as Regents of the University of California v. [read post]
30 Jul 2020, 8:47 am by Luke Burton
Michigan State University Board of Trustees, 944 F.3d 613 (6th Cir. 2019), which deepened a circuit split regarding institutional liability for “deliberate indifference” under Title IX, and Doe v. [read post]