Search for: "Baker v. Miller" Results 21 - 40 of 221
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Apr 2021, 9:40 pm by Josh Blackman
Several years ago, courts across the land anticipated the overruling of Baker v. [read post]
21 Sep 2020, 2:00 pm by Amy Howe
In 2001, Miller Cassidy merged with Baker Botts, a larger, Texas-based firm, and Barrett spent another year there before leaving for academia. [read post]
5 Jun 2020, 3:00 am by Jim Sedor
Campaign Funds for Judges Warp Criminal Justice, Study Finds New York Times – Adam Liptak | Published: 6/1/2020 In Gideon v. [read post]
16 Feb 2020, 4:52 pm by INFORRM
Resolved – IPSO mediation 08369-19 Miller v The Sunday Times, No breach – after investigation Resolution statement 07779-19 Wallace v Echo (Basildon), Resolved – IPSO mediation 07037-19 Foley v Mail Online, No breach – after investigation 06303-19 Hoy v Wisbech Standard, No breach – after investigation 06056-19 Baker v The Daily Telegraph, Breach – sanction: action as offered by publication 05072-19… [read post]
27 Oct 2019, 5:08 pm by INFORRM
The phone hacking saga continues with Byline Investigates reporting that Sienna Miller and Sir Simon Hughes have launched claims against the Sun. [read post]
24 Oct 2019, 9:16 am by Nate Nead
Rice University’s Baker Institute for Public Policy revealed that the effect on care-quality from vertical alignment is almost non-existent when comparing performance measures across hospitals with loosely affiliated independent practices to those that have been integrated [16]. [read post]
24 Oct 2019, 9:16 am by Nate Nead
Rice University’s Baker Institute for Public Policy revealed that the effect on care-quality from vertical alignment is almost non-existent when comparing performance measures across hospitals with loosely affiliated independent practices to those that have been integrated [16]. [read post]
2 Oct 2019, 10:21 am by Deborah Heller
The district court granted the request for expert witness fees, but denied the personnel expense request finding that the phrase “all the expenses of the proceedings” was not specific and explicit to include such expenses due to the presumption under the “American Rule” that litigants pay their own attorneys’ fees (quoting Baker Botts L.L.P. v. [read post]