Search for: "Banks v. Barnes et al" Results 21 - 34 of 34
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Jun 2015, 3:49 pm by Barry Sookman
Winnipeg Regional Health Authority et al., 2015 MBCA 44 Schrems v Data Protection Commissioner [2014] IEHC 310 American Civil Liberties Union v. [read post]
12 Jan 2011, 2:00 am by John Day
Harper, et al., The Law of Torts §§ 25.1, at 493 (2d ed. 1986)] (‘Harper’). [read post]
23 Mar 2011, 6:24 am by Adam Chandler
(Disclosure: Goldstein, Howe & Russell represents 3M Company et al. as amici curiae in support of respondents.) [read post]
12 Jan 2012, 3:22 am by LindaMBeale
  In Marshall and Judith Cohan, et al., v. [read post]
2 Dec 2021, 2:55 am by Kevin Kaufman
Pappas et al. find that counterfeit cigarettes can have as much as seven times the lead of authentic brands, and close to three times as much thallium, a toxic heavy metal.[14] Other sources report finding insect eggs, dead flies, mold, and human feces in counterfeit cigarettes.[15] During prohibition of alcohol in the United States during the 1920s, increased enforcement did not manage to significantly decrease the prevalence of bootlegging because the profit margins were so… [read post]
6 Dec 2022, 3:45 am by Kyle Hulehan
Key Findings: Excessive tax rates on cigarettes induce substantial black and gray market movement of tobacco products into high-tax states from low-tax states or foreign sources. [read post]