Search for: "Barnett v. State of Maine" Results 21 - 40 of 83
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Jan 2023, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
”  Randy Barnett and Gary Lawson were among the first to adopt uncompromisingly originalist positions. [read post]
21 Jan 2020, 1:36 pm by Ayelet Waldman
We used to stand up with our classmates every morning and timelessly pledge liberty and justice for all, even and especially for those (as the Supreme Court, agreeing with the ACLU, ruled in West Virginia State Board of Education v. [read post]
13 Jul 2012, 6:43 am by Rachel Sachs
The Los Angeles Times reports on the introduction by Senator Jim Webb of a new bill, the Military Service Integrity Act, in response to the Court’s recent decision in United States v. [read post]
1 Jun 2018, 10:21 am by Sandy Levinson
 States tomorrow could, as Maine has recently done, adopt the alternative transferable vote, and Congress could tomorrow simply vote to repeal the 1842 legislation, reaffirmed in the 1960s, that requires single-member congressional districts. [read post]
29 Sep 2020, 6:13 pm by Anna Salvatore, Benjamin Wittes
Flynn filed a motion to compel certain material under Brady v. [read post]
19 Feb 2010, 9:05 am by Lawrence Solum
Before I engage substantively with Coan’s claims, let me state clearly how much I admire this piece. [read post]
16 Apr 2009, 4:54 am
The key to the free speech argument is that forcing fans to stay put arguably coerces their participation in the ritual, in violation of the First Amendment protection against compelled expression recognized in Barnette v. [read post]
25 Jul 2022, 4:30 am by Eric Segall
The Court's decision in Loving v Virginia says nothing to the contrary regarding original understanding. [read post]
2 Feb 2023, 6:30 am by John Mikhail
In addition, Wilson was one of the main authors of the 1790 Pennsylvania constitution—another surprisingly neglected fact about him, which bears on Moore v. [read post]
3 Oct 2016, 5:53 am by Eugene Volokh
United States, 491 U.S. 617, 624-25 (1989) (noting and accepting the government’s concession on this score); United States v. [read post]
5 Mar 2017, 4:05 pm by INFORRM
’  We had posts about this by Steve Barnett and Martin Moore. [read post]
15 Apr 2011, 6:02 am by Bexis
  We, of course think that's wrong under Erie - where the default should be, if a form of liability hasn't been recognized by a state court, then it should be dismissed by a federal court applying that state's law in a diversity action.ConnecticutIn Gerrity v. [read post]