Search for: "Bartlett v. State of Florida*"
Results 21 - 40
of 48
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Feb 2015, 11:43 am
App. 1996); Pysz v. [read post]
7 Nov 2014, 5:52 am
By our count, federal judges have trampled over state sovereignty with respect to the heeding presumption in no fewer than eleven states – Alaska, Colorado (despite contrary state-court authority), Georgia, Hawaii, Illinois, Iowa, Kentucky, Maine, New York (despite contrary state-court authority), South Dakota, and Wyoming.Finally, because various states have taken quite different approaches to whether a heeding presumption exists at all and… [read post]
22 Oct 2014, 4:30 am
Fronczak v. [read post]
18 Jul 2014, 11:55 am
June. 13, 2013), holding essentially that, since those meanies on the United States Supreme Court aren’t letting plaintiffs sue generic manufacturers, we’ll change Alabama common law and let them sue someone else. [read post]
27 Jun 2014, 9:43 am
Bartlett, 133 S. [read post]
23 Jun 2014, 12:57 pm
” Best v. [read post]
13 Jan 2014, 4:05 am
Proia, Freeing the Prop 8 Tape: Perry v. [read post]
17 Oct 2013, 5:00 am
.Bartlett v. [read post]
5 Sep 2013, 12:24 pm
Bartlett, 133 S. [read post]
3 Jul 2013, 6:42 am
Bartlett, and American Express v. [read post]
3 Jul 2013, 5:00 am
” Palmer v. [read post]
5 Jun 2013, 9:34 am
The laws that apply to generic drugs recently shifted in favor of the manufacturers at the expense of injured consumers in 2011 when the United States Supreme Court ruled in the case of Pilva, Inc. v. [read post]
21 Mar 2013, 3:04 pm
Howard v. [read post]
5 Sep 2012, 7:10 am
See Bunney v. [read post]
23 May 2012, 2:38 pm
Bartlett v. [read post]
28 Oct 2011, 7:00 am
New Hampshire Bartlett v. [read post]
24 Jun 2011, 3:25 pm
Bartlett (1984), courts are limited to the statutory text, legislative history, and views of the Executive Branch or can instead also consider other external indicia; and (2) whether the lower court properly ruled that a Native American tribe's reservation had been "disestablished. [read post]
2 Jun 2011, 12:46 pm
State, 686 S.E.2d 483, 485-86 (Ga. [read post]
28 Apr 2011, 3:18 pm
At least the state of the art at the time of the plaintiff’s use applies – unknown and later discovered risks are irrelevant. [read post]
20 Apr 2011, 10:16 am
Again, this opinion is valid only for the State of Massachusetts and not Utah. [read post]
