Search for: "Batty v. Batty" Results 21 - 37 of 37
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Sep 2010, 5:24 pm by INFORRM
Latest Cases BBC v HarperCollins, 1 September 2010, Morgan J (ChD). [read post]
19 Feb 2014, 4:30 am
   Perhaps it is simply because of the batty consumer protection laws out there. [read post]
13 Feb 2012, 3:48 am by Rosalind English
Batty behaviour in a Hampshire habitat Pigswill and public health – a load of EU bull The environmental advantages of cultured meat The future of meat Rate this: Share:EmailDiggLike this:Be the first to like this post. [read post]
5 Jan 2012, 10:16 am by Rosalind English
Batty behaviour in a Hampshire habitat Pigswill and public health – a load of EU bull The environmental advantages of cultured meat Rate this: Share:EmailDiggLike this:Be the first to like this post. [read post]
19 Apr 2011, 10:00 pm by Rosalind English
R (on the application of K and AC Jackson and Son) v DEFRA – read judgment. [read post]
10 Apr 2010, 8:47 am by INFORRM
Y’know, get her hair done in highlights, get like tattoo done on her batty crease, y’know, have the whole thing shaved—very nice but it didn’t make any more difference. [read post]
19 Jan 2023, 1:11 pm by Michael Oykhman
” It may be “stored” even if the accused places them temporarily out of sight with the intention of retrieving them later… To meet the third criterion (the accused acted “in a careless manner or without reasonable precautions for the safety of other persons”), the Crown must show that the accused acted in a way which caused a risk to people or property (see: R v Batty, 2014 ONCA 620 (CanLII)). [read post]
7 Jun 2024, 5:11 am by Michael Oykhman
” It may be “stored” even if the accused places them temporarily out of sight with the intention of retrieving them later… To meet the third criterion (the accused acted “in a careless manner or without reasonable precautions for the safety of other persons”), the Crown must show that the accused acted in a way which caused a risk to people or property (see: R v Batty, 2014 ONCA 620 (CanLII)). [read post]