Search for: "Bauer Manufacturing Inc" Results 21 - 40 of 40
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
31 Jan 2011, 3:19 am by Kelly
Browne Drug Co., Inc (TTABlog) Don’t forget trade dress in your manufacturing agreements: District Court S D New York decision in Technimed SRL v Kidz-Med, Inc. [read post]
Use
23 Jan 2011, 11:42 pm
Citing Bauer & Cie v. [read post]
3 Sep 2008, 9:21 am
Bauer Compressors, Inc., 279 F.3d 1022, 1029 (Fed. [read post]
28 May 2010, 11:51 pm
Leviton Manufacturing Company, Inc. [read post]
19 Jul 2007, 8:47 pm
" If that footnote doesn't make you swoon, check out his latest opinion, Central Manufacturing, Inc. v. [read post]
10 May 2010, 3:55 am
(IP Law Blog) TTAB finds SMIC and TSMC wafer grid logos confusingly similar for identical goods and services: Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co Ltd v Semiconductor Manufacturing International (Shanghai) Corporation (not precedential) (TTABlog) Test your TTAB judge-ability on this section 2(e)(1) mere descriptiveness refusal of CLUB DANCE for restaurant and bar services (TTABlog)   US Trade Marks – Lawsuits and strategic steps Blumberg Industries – Blumberg… [read post]
10 Apr 2013, 12:17 pm
(John Bauer) As with any magical creature, there is some uncertainty about the trolls' characteristics, but they are usually thought to be creatures (companies) that hold a portfolio of patents, but do not commercially manufacture their inventions, focusing instead on asserting their patents (or threatening to) in courts, in order to secure lucrative licensing agreements. [read post]
30 Jan 2009, 7:00 pm
Here is IP Think Tank’s weekly selection of top intellectual property news breaking in the blogosphere and internet. [read post]
20 Jun 2018, 5:00 pm by John Elwood
Respondent Archer and White Sales is a former distributor of dental equipment manufactured by the petitioners. [read post]
9 May 2018, 9:40 am by John Elwood
Just like the recently granted Lamps Plus Inc v. [read post]
25 Jun 2018, 5:39 pm by John Elwood
Albrecht, 17-290 Issue: Whether a state-law failure-to-warn claim is pre-empted when the Food and Drug Administration rejected the drug manufacturer’s proposal to warn about the risk after being provided with the relevant scientific data, or whether such a case must go to a jury for conjecture as to why the FDA rejected the proposed warning. [read post]