Search for: "Becton v. United States"
Results 21 - 40
of 115
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Dec 2017, 3:24 am
Kohler Co. v. [read post]
11 Aug 2017, 10:31 am
Becton Dickinson & Co., 486 U.S. 196(1988)). [read post]
6 Dec 2016, 12:18 pm
Retractable Technologies, Inc. v. [read post]
8 Feb 2016, 7:49 pm
In United States ex rel. [read post]
8 Feb 2016, 7:49 pm
In United States ex rel. [read post]
16 Apr 2015, 9:37 am
United States v. [read post]
8 Jun 2014, 9:38 pm
Becton Dickson & Co., No. 2013-1408 (Fed. [read post]
17 Mar 2014, 7:20 pm
Procedural HistoryBecton, Dickinson and Company (Becton) and Nova Biomedical Corporation (Nova) appeal the denial of various fees sought based on an eight-year long patent infringement suit in the United States District Court for the Northern District of California involving patents owned by Therasense, Inc. [read post]
6 Mar 2014, 10:45 am
In a prior case, Retractable Technologies v. [read post]
16 Jan 2014, 2:04 pm
Becton Dickinson & Co., which held that a decision on the merits is a "final decision" that can be appealed even if the award or amount of attorneys' fees for the litigation remains to be determined.Or, in Justice Kennedy's own words:Federal courts of appeals have jurisdiction of appeals from "final decisions" of United States district courts. 28 U. [read post]
2 Dec 2013, 11:57 am
In Budinich v. [read post]
16 Nov 2013, 7:59 pm
Becton, Dickinson and Co., 649 F.3d 1276, 1285 (Fed. [read post]
9 Oct 2013, 3:03 pm
Today, the Federal Circuit upheld the District Court’s inequitable conduct verdict based on the submission of false affidavits to the United States Patent & Trademark Office (“PTO”). [read post]
13 Feb 2013, 4:30 am
Covell v. [read post]
22 Jan 2013, 4:10 am
There, the question was whether the logo was an official insignia falling with Section 2(b), i.e., was it “of the same class as the flag or coats of arms of the United States. [read post]
31 Dec 2012, 7:47 pm
United States v. [read post]
9 Oct 2012, 7:32 am
Becton, Dickinson & Co., 649 F.3d 1276 (Fed. [read post]
22 Aug 2012, 8:51 pm
Cal. 2008) (“[F]or an inven-tion conceived outside the United States, the date of conception for purposes of priority for a United States patent is the date the invention is first reported to the inventor’s agent within the United States. [read post]
3 May 2012, 10:00 pm
Trade Representative Issues 2012 Special 301 Report – This post discusses the Office of the United States Representative’s 2012 Special 301 Report, which focused on the state of intellectual property rights worldwide, identifies thirteen countries on a “Priority Watch List” and another 28 countries on the “Watch List,” all relating to deficiencies in intellectual property protection in these countries. [read post]
3 May 2012, 10:00 pm
Trade Representative Issues 2012 Special 301 Report – This post discusses the Office of the United States Representative’s 2012 Special 301 Report, which focused on the state of intellectual property rights worldwide, identifies thirteen countries on a “Priority Watch List” and another 28 countries on the “Watch List,” all relating to deficiencies in intellectual property protection in these countries. [read post]
