Search for: "Bell Helicopter Textron Inc"
Results 21 - 37
of 37
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Sep 2015, 8:19 am
Textron Inc., No. [read post]
15 Oct 2022, 8:27 am
Bell Helicopter Textron, Inc., 651 F. [read post]
17 Nov 2017, 7:01 am
Bell Helicopters Textron Inc., 417 F.3d 450, 455 (5th Cir. 2005) (acknowledging that a cost-benefit analysis can weigh on the government’s decision to enter the case). [read post]
21 Feb 2012, 8:38 am
EA fights for its right to use Bell helicopters. [read post]
3 Dec 2010, 10:44 am
Bell Helicopter Textron, Inc., 107 F.3d 744, 749 n.3. (9th Cir. 1997). [read post]
22 Jan 2010, 5:39 am
These include $1.2 billion for Boeing CH-47 Chinook helicopters; $3.1 billion for different models of H-60 helicopters built by Sikorsky Aircraft, a unit of United Technologies Corp; and $2.7 billion for V-22 tilt-rotor planes built by Boeing and Bell Helicopter, a Textron Inc unit. [read post]
8 Jul 2016, 4:00 am
Bell Helicopter Textron Canada Limited, 2016 FC 590, the court clarified that this limit applied across bifurcated proceedings. [read post]
29 Jan 2008, 6:00 am
Among those mentioned are several sales tax cases that, through mid-January, have been set for trial or for hearing on a motion for summary judgment in 2008 (note that the following list is not inclusive of all such cases): Bell Helicopter Textron, Inc. v. [read post]
3 Mar 2020, 4:00 am
Bell Helicopter Textron Canada Limitée, 2012 FC 113 citing Pfizer Canada Inc v Apotex Inc, 2007 FC 971, the Court said it is entitled to look at all the patents and other publications that a skilled technician would discover in a ‘reasonable and diligent search’ to determine whether the resulting ‘mosaic’ leads directly to the invention. [read post]
24 Apr 2018, 2:05 pm
Bell Helicopter Textron, Inc., 806 F.3d 335, 341 n.7 (5th Cir. 2015) (so noting), but this Circuit's view appears to be settled by Titan Holdings, 898 F.2d at 273.) [read post]
16 Oct 2012, 7:48 am
Bell Helicopter Textron, Inc., ARB No. 12-110, ALJ No. 2009-AIR-20 (ARB Sept. 19, 2012), the complainant had died and his widow filed a petition for review six months after the ALJ dismissal. [read post]
18 Feb 2020, 4:00 am
Pfizer Canada ULC, 2020 FC 1, at para. 42. [3] See Sections 27(3)(b) and 28.3 of the Patent Act, RSC 1985, c P-4 [4] Burton Parsons Chemicals, Inc v Hewlett-Packard (Canada) Ltd, [1976] 1 SCR 555 at 563 [5] Apotex Inc v Sanofi-Synthelabo Canada Inc, 2008 SCC 61 at paragraph 37, [2008] 3 SCR 265; see also Bell Helicopter Textron Canada Limitée v Eurocopter, société par actions simplifiée, 2013 FCA 219 at paragraph 65;… [read post]
5 May 2015, 4:00 am
Entitlement to punitive damages may be either in the first phase or the second phase (see Bell Helicopter Textron Canada Limitée v. [read post]
19 Feb 2016, 11:57 am
Isonas, Inc., 2014 WL 10988340 (C.D. [read post]
11 Aug 2011, 1:09 pm
Medtronic, Inc., 552 U.S. 312 (2008). [read post]
29 Sep 2021, 12:18 pm
Bell Helicopter Textron, Inc., 806 F.3d 335, 341 n.7 (5th Cir. 2015) (so noting), but this Circuit's view appears to be set forth by Lord & Taylor.) [read post]
17 Mar 2022, 10:34 am
Bell Helicopter Textron, Inc., 806 F.3d 335, 341 n.7 (5th Cir. 2015) (so noting), but this Circuit's view appears to be set forth by Lord & Taylor.) [read post]