Search for: "Berger v. White" Results 21 - 40 of 89
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Nov 2020, 5:14 am by Anna Carrier (BE)
That said, the leading lawmaker role has been allocated to Stefan Berger (EPP / Germany), he will be supported by Ondřej Kovařík (Renew / Czech Republic), Antonio Maria Rinaldi (ID / Italy) and Patryk Jaki (ECR / Poland). [read post]
18 Oct 2020, 3:15 pm by Ilya Somin
As far back as 1973, Justice William Rehnquist's dissent in Roe v. [read post]
28 Jun 2020, 9:02 pm by Cary Coglianese
Writing still decades earlier in Berger v. [read post]
25 Jun 2020, 7:56 am by Stephen Griffin
  This Act is obviously centrally concerned with providing rights to black citizens that are already provided to white citizens. [read post]
6 Feb 2020, 11:11 am by Jeh Johnson
The notion that Congress declares war and the president conducts it has never been black and white. [read post]
10 Jan 2020, 11:56 am by Jonathan Shaub
The most senior White House officials—Mulvaney, Eisenberg and Blair, along with other individuals like Bolton and his deputy, Charles Kupperman—have either spurned a subpoena or declined to appear voluntarily because the White House has claimed they are absolutely immune from compelled congressional testimony. [read post]
17 Dec 2019, 12:15 pm by Ronald Collins
Berger’s claim that the 14th Amendment was not understood at the time to establish a principle of racial equality is pretty clearly correct, even if some of Berger’s specific arguments are flawed. [read post]
8 Nov 2019, 3:00 am by Jim Sedor
Esposito, whose firm says it employs a half-dozen other lobbyists, some of whom have White House and congressional experience, said his clients had scrutinized his record and would have detected any falsehoods. [read post]
31 Oct 2019, 5:59 am by Jonathan Shaub
In his seminal work calling executive privilege a “constitutional myth,” Raoul Berger wrote that when “seeking to ascertain the boundaries between the conflicting claims of Congress and the President, questions of practical convenience need to be separated from the issue of constitutional power. [read post]
24 Aug 2019, 6:30 am by Dan Ernst
  This event is closed to the public.Student Presenters:Jonathon Booth, Harvard University (jonathonbooth@g.harvard.edu) The Birth of Policing in Post-Emancipation JamaicaLauren Feldman, Johns Hopkins University (lauren.feldman@jhu.edu) Constructing Legal Matrimony and the State in New York and the United States: Debating New York's Marriage Act of 1827 and its EffectsJamie Grischkan, Boston University (jgrisch@bu.edu) Banking, Law, and American Liberalism: The Rise and… [read post]
21 Aug 2019, 1:09 pm by Dan Ernst
Student Presenters: Jonathon Booth, Harvard University (jonathonbooth@g.harvard.edu)The Birth of Policing in Post-Emancipation JamaicaLauren Feldman, Johns Hopkins University (Lauren.feldman@jhu.edu)Constructing Legal Matrimony and the State in New York and the United States: Debating New York’s Marriage Act of 1827 and its EffectsJamie Grischkan, Boston University (jgrisch@bu.edu)Banking, Law, and American Liberalism: The Rise and Regulation of Bank Holding Companies in the Twentieth… [read post]
1 Aug 2019, 8:30 am by Seeger Weiss LLP
This has included a $280 million settlement in United States of America ex rel Ven-A-Care of the Florida Keys, Inc. v. [read post]