Search for: "Best v. Polk" Results 21 - 40 of 70
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Jun 2019, 6:42 am
Russo, Mayer Brown LLP, on Wednesday, June 19, 2019 Tags: Broker-dealers, Compliance & ethics, Conflicts of interest, Fiduciary duties, Investor protection, Regulation Best Interest, SEC, SEC rulemaking, Securities regulation Delaware’s New Competition Posted by William J. [read post]
24 May 2019, 4:36 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
“An attorney’s conduct or inaction is the proximate [*5]cause of a plaintiff’s damages if ‘but for’ the attorney’s negligence ‘the plaintiff would have succeeded on the merits of the underlying action'” (Nomura Asset Capital Corp. v Cadwalader, Wickersham & Taft LLP, 26 NY3d 40, 50 [2015], rearg denied 27 NY3d 957 [2016], quoting AmBase Corp. v Davis Polk & Wardwell, 8 NY3d 428, 434 [2007]). [read post]
17 Apr 2019, 7:41 am by Patrick W. Krechowski, Esq.
  https://casetext.com/case/hirt-v-polk-cty-bd-of-cty-comrs  Of course, there are always exceptions to a rule, and in this case certiorari review is not applicable to appeals pursuant to the Administrative Procedures Act as set forth in Chapter 120, Florida Statutes. [read post]
19 Oct 2018, 5:50 am by Thaddeus Hoffmeister
”  Failure to Disclose a Hardship The Missouri Court of Appeals issued an opinion in State v. [read post]
25 Oct 2017, 3:00 am by John Jenkins
 Steve does his best to describe what the company’s proposing in plain English. [read post]
3 Jun 2017, 1:13 pm by J. Ross Pepper
To see how this rule can play out to the detriment of a landowner, consider the recent case of Ocoee Utility District of Bradley and Polk Counties v. [read post]
3 Jun 2017, 1:13 pm by J. Ross Pepper
To see how this rule can play out to the detriment of a landowner, consider the recent case of Ocoee Utility District of Bradley and Polk Counties v. [read post]
24 Aug 2016, 2:11 pm
Lee, 683 N.W.2d 309, 315 (Minnesota Supreme Court 2004) (noting that, when definitions of criminal offenses overlap, `the state has the discretion to charge a person with the offense which is best supported by the available evidence and which carries a penalty commensurate with the culpable acts involved’).State v. [read post]