Search for: "Black v. State Personnel Board"
Results 21 - 40
of 114
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Aug 2015, 7:51 pm
Div. 2007) State v. [read post]
11 Mar 2023, 12:01 am
Board of Regents. [read post]
7 Oct 2011, 3:10 am
Board of Chosen Freeholders of Burlington County, et al. [read post]
1 Apr 2022, 3:41 pm
State Conf. of NAACP v. [read post]
29 Sep 2013, 6:53 pm
Separation of Powers and Checks and Balances --Youngstown Sheet & Tube Co. v. [read post]
4 Aug 2015, 11:09 am
[could potentially complicate] matters for President Vladimir V. [read post]
4 Aug 2015, 11:09 am
[could potentially complicate] matters for President Vladimir V. [read post]
16 Dec 2018, 6:47 am
In the case of McCrary v. [read post]
16 Mar 2022, 12:14 pm
She also ruled against the South Carolina State Election Commission in striking down a witness requirement for absentee voting during the height of the pandemic, in Middleton v. [read post]
29 Apr 2010, 11:17 am
Black v. [read post]
13 May 2022, 4:00 am
A notice published by the board said the meeting, held 12 days after Meng’s resignation, was closed so board members could discuss a “chief executive officer’s briefing on performance, employment, and personnel items. [read post]
22 Nov 2008, 2:52 pm
> NEWS · Jefferson County Personnel Board: Consent Decree coming to end w/ $10M+ atty fees bill on deck · Plaintiffs in Hutton and Whorton v. [read post]
11 Jun 2010, 3:46 pm
Black v. [read post]
27 Jul 2012, 11:00 am
Smith and U.S. v. [read post]
19 Jun 2015, 2:04 pm
The breach of personnel data occurred was discovered four months ago. [read post]
28 Apr 2022, 9:01 pm
Consider, for example, Personnel Administrator of Massachusetts v. [read post]
4 Jun 2020, 1:44 pm
Minnesota is one of only a handful of states with third degree murder on the books. [read post]
8 Feb 2017, 11:07 am
Quinta Jurecic posted the recording of the Ninth Circuit oral argument from Washington v. [read post]
22 Jan 2020, 8:31 am
Zarda, and Bostock v. [read post]
9 Feb 2017, 10:51 am
Carrie Cordero outlined a few quick thoughts on making national security arguments in court based on Washington v. [read post]
