Search for: "Black v. Territory"
Results 21 - 40
of 502
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Aug 2023, 2:18 pm
In Padavan v. [read post]
12 Jul 2023, 8:00 am
Magliocca's Prawfsblawg post focuses on the Supreme Court's 1947 decision in Kotch v. [read post]
30 Jun 2023, 6:19 am
Justice Clarence Thomas’s concurring opinion in Students for Fair Admissions, Inc. v. [read post]
25 Jun 2023, 10:54 am
"[16] But Claiborne Hardware had no occasion to decide whether a person's not dealing with someone based on that someone's race was itself protected by the First Amendment, because it was clear that Mississippi law did not prohibit such private choices not to deal.[17] Under Mississippi law, whites could generally refuse to deal with blacks, and blacks could refuse to deal with whites. [read post]
9 Jun 2023, 8:01 am
First, as the ICC has territorial jurisdiction in the current situation on the basis of Ukraine’s 2015 declaration under article 12(3) of the Statute, the fact of a crime’s codification in the ICC Statute means that, if applicable, it could underpin a prosecution at the Court. [read post]
31 May 2023, 4:00 am
Dred Scott (Court holds that Blacks are not and cannot be citizens, and Congress cannot end slavery in the territories) (also, Court decided merits even though no jurisdiction) (also, case was leaked to the President so he could pressure a northern justice to join the majority).3. [read post]
30 May 2023, 10:12 am
However, increasingly, parliament, the government and the courts are cracking down on what they see as unfair black holes in employment protections. [read post]
26 May 2023, 12:42 pm
Abbott v. [read post]
25 May 2023, 11:06 am
Sandford (1857): In this pre-Civil War case, Dred Scott was an enslaved man who was taken by his enslaver into a free state (Illinois) and a free federal territory (the Wisconsin territory). [read post]
18 Apr 2023, 1:53 pm
In United States v. [read post]
7 Apr 2023, 5:11 pm
How do you measure the risk of freedom of expression v. copyright takedowns? [read post]
10 Mar 2023, 6:05 am
For example, at the war’s outset, Russia declared “restricted zones” in the Black Sea and Sea of Azov. [read post]
10 Mar 2023, 3:26 am
“Pay now, argue later” is ultimately the decision of the Supreme Court in Sara & Hossein Asset Holdings Ltd v Blacks Outdoor Retail Ltd. [read post]
7 Mar 2023, 6:30 am
If this seems too bleak a view of the Court, consider that this is exactly what the Court did in Vega v. [read post]
26 Feb 2023, 5:48 pm
Created by the Sentencing Reform Act found within the Comprehensive Crime Control Act of 1984, the Supreme Court of the United States approved its authority in Mistretta v. [read post]
8 Feb 2023, 5:39 am
I also want to congratulate the new leader of the House Democrats and the first Black House Minority Leader in history, Hakeem Jeffries. [read post]
6 Feb 2023, 11:23 am
American Civil Liberties Union Kansas v. [read post]
23 Jan 2023, 7:30 am
Their images should be treated with the same scorn as those depicting Chief Justice Roger Taney, the author of the execrable decision in Dred Scott v. [read post]
20 Jan 2023, 5:16 am
And in the Flatow case, known as Flatow v. [read post]
3 Jan 2023, 1:47 pm
The directors’ and officers’ liability environment is always changing, but 2022 was a particularly eventful year, with important consequences for the D&O insurance marketplace. [read post]
