Search for: "Blair v. State" Results 21 - 40 of 498
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Feb 2016, 4:00 am by The Public Employment Law Press
The right to a disciplinary hearing may survive the individual’s resignation or retirement from the position Hughes v. [read post]
11 Jul 2012, 4:59 am
Right to a disciplinary hearing survives the individual’s retirement from the position Blair v Horn, 2008 NY Slip Op 32581(U), Supreme Court, New York County, Docket Number: 0100105/2008, Judge: Marcy S. [read post]
17 Aug 2012, 2:00 am by sally
High Court (Queen’s Bench Division) Cornish Glennroy Blair-Ford v CRS Adventures Ltd [2012] EWHC 2360 (QB) (13 August 2012) High Court (Administrative Court) Nicklinson, R (on the application of) v Ministry Of Justice [2012] EWHC 2381 (Admin) (16 August 2012) Albion Water Ltd, R (on the application of) v Water Services Regulation Authority [2012] EWHC 2259 (Admin) (16 August 2012) Searle & Anor v Secretary of State for Communities and… [read post]
14 Jun 2010, 10:11 am
He's unpopular as a result.Various state actors disagree with the individual's views, and as a result, they remove him as the vice-president of a particular Board. [read post]
2 May 2008, 10:05 am
., Edmunds, reversed the Eastern District of Tennessee's denial of a motion to suppress and vacated a defendant's sentence on a firearms offense in United States v. [read post]
1 Oct 2008, 11:15 am
If an employee has been served with disciplinary charges, his or her right to a disciplinary hearing survives his or her retirement from the position Matter of Blair v Horn, 2008 NY Slip Op 32581(U), September 12, 2008, Supreme Court, New York County, Docket Number: 0100105/2008, Judge: Marcy S. [read post]
25 Apr 2011, 10:55 pm by Martin Downs
Blair J stated that in ordinary disciplinary proceedings, where all that was at stake was the loss of a specific job, Article 6 would not be engaged. [read post]
17 Nov 2010, 11:53 pm
In Guangzhou Dockyards Co Ltd v ENE Aegialii [2010] EWHC 2826 (Comm), Mr Justice Blair dismissed an application which had sought to appeal against an arbitration award on an issue of fact.A dispute arose between Guangzhou Dockyards Co Ltd (GD), a Chinese dockyard owner, and ENE Aegialii (ENE), a shipowner, in relation to a contract pursuant to which GD were to convert ENE's crude oil carrier into an ore carrier. [read post]
26 Jul 2010, 1:00 am by INFORRM
On 13 July, Sir Anthony May, the President of the Queen’s Bench Division, and Mr Justice Blair handed down their judgment in R (Gaunt) v Ofcom. [read post]
21 Jul 2011, 5:53 pm by zshapiro
But in regard to whether Blair’s right to due process was denied by the three year period between the conviction and the filing of the opening brief, the Ninth Circuit followed it’s precedent in Hayes v. [read post]