Search for: "Booker v. Thomas"
Results 21 - 40
of 116
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 May 2017, 4:06 pm
Feature pic : courtesy of Thomas Hawk on Flickr (Creative Commons) – thanks! [read post]
7 Mar 2017, 12:07 pm
Justice Thomas with opinion in Beckles v. [read post]
1 Jul 2016, 4:44 am
See United States v. [read post]
14 Feb 2016, 6:59 am
, Melendez-Diaz v. [read post]
28 Oct 2015, 6:28 pm
In United States v. [read post]
3 Jun 2015, 1:08 pm
Louis V. [read post]
10 Jan 2015, 3:33 pm
You can go back and compare them with what Mr Booker sees and says. [read post]
20 Oct 2014, 3:11 pm
Here is Justice Scalia (joined by Justices Thomas and Ginsburg): Any fact that increases the penalty to which a defendant is exposed constitutes an element of a crime, Apprendi v. [read post]
15 Oct 2014, 4:04 am
Jones v. [read post]
14 Oct 2014, 9:52 am
Supreme Court decided not to take up the case of Jones v. [read post]
14 Oct 2014, 9:37 am
First, the defense bar had its crack at this issue in Booker. [read post]
22 May 2014, 6:12 am
This kind of imposition, Apprendi and Blakely and Booker said, was unconstitutional. [read post]
14 May 2014, 7:40 am
Louis V. [read post]
30 Mar 2014, 7:14 am
United States v. [read post]
14 Nov 2013, 1:04 pm
Simon.Stahl, Philip Michael.Chicago, Illinois : ABA Section of Family Law, [2013]KF547 .S733 2013 Family Law According to our hearts : Rhinelander v. [read post]
2 Jul 2013, 1:41 pm
The other day, I was blogging about tags, and somebody asked what are all the tags. [read post]
23 Jun 2013, 9:28 pm
In Alleyne v. [read post]
22 Mar 2013, 12:09 pm
Thomas wrote the disent in Harris and Ginsburg joined him so they will very likely side with Alleyne. [read post]
1 Mar 2013, 1:27 pm
Booker that the Guidelines, while still relevant, cannot be mandatory, to avoid constitutional objections under Apprendi v. [read post]
14 Aug 2012, 6:34 pm
Booker, which applied Blakely to the federal sentencing guidelines. [read post]
