Search for: "Bourne v. Bourne"
Results 21 - 40
of 106
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
31 Oct 2018, 3:01 am
Ross, IJ Short Circuit, on Young v. [read post]
7 Sep 2018, 3:06 am
Bernstein, Notre Dame Journal on Legislation] Study finds that after Minnesota jacked up minimum wage, youth employment and restaurant employment fell, restaurant prices rose [Noah Williams, Center for Research on the Wisconsin Economy] In a sleeper SCOTUS case this term, Encino Motorcars v. [read post]
6 Oct 2007, 8:47 am
This holding was adopted and arguably expanded in later cases, most notably Suntrust v. [read post]
10 Jun 2021, 7:34 am
The case reference is Kaplan v. [read post]
26 Jun 2012, 7:06 am
The style of the case is, National Union Fire Insurance Company et al. v. [read post]
27 Jul 2019, 9:03 am
I explain why in my new Cato post on Parker Drilling v. [read post]
4 Mar 2010, 9:48 pm
After nearly three years of discovery, the parties in the massive Viacom v. [read post]
30 Dec 2008, 7:35 am
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit has today issued its ruling in John Doe v. [read post]
25 Jan 2018, 9:49 am
” See alsoSoverain, 778 F.3d at 1315; Bourns, Inc. v. [read post]
31 Jul 2012, 2:29 am
Court of Appeal (Civil Division) Telefonica O2 UK Ltd & Ors v British Telecommunications Plc & Anor [2012] EWCA Civ 1002 (25 July 2012) High Court (Queen’s Bench Division) AC v Farooq & Anor [2012] EWHC 1484 (QB) (30 July 2012) High Court (Chancery Division) Davies v AIB Group (UK) Plc [2012] EWHC 2178 (Ch) (27 July 2012) Hughes & Ors v Bourne & Ors [2012] EWHC 2232 (Ch) (27 July 2012) High Court (Administrative Court)… [read post]
30 Jul 2011, 11:43 am
X, Y & Z v the United Kingdom – 32666/10 [2011] ECHR 1199The long and sorry story of X & Y v Hounslow appears to have reached an end. [read post]
30 Jul 2011, 11:43 am
X, Y & Z v the United Kingdom – 32666/10 [2011] ECHR 1199The long and sorry story of X & Y v Hounslow appears to have reached an end. [read post]
30 Jul 2011, 11:43 am
X, Y & Z v the United Kingdom – 32666/10 [2011] ECHR 1199The long and sorry story of X & Y v Hounslow appears to have reached an end. [read post]
18 Feb 2019, 1:05 am
Supreme Court could help rein in the administrative state by overruling Auer v. [read post]
27 Sep 2011, 4:42 am
Bourne, 2011 U.S. [read post]
26 Jun 2019, 3:01 am
[Scott Shackford, Reason] By 6-3 margin, with three Justices concurring in part and dissenting in part, Supreme Court rules that First Amendment bars rule against registration of “scandalous” trademarks; Cato had submitted a humorous brief [Melissa Quinn, Washington Examiner, Ilya Shapiro, earlier; Iancu v. [read post]
15 May 2019, 2:58 am
“Banana Costume Copyright Assailed at Third Circuit” [Emilee Larkin, Courthouse News, earlier] In a new piece for The Bulwark, I sort through some comments by presidential candidate Pete Buttigieg critical of identity politics; Supreme Court’s decision in Apple v. [read post]
8 Jan 2020, 3:47 am
Malibu Media, L.L.C. v. [read post]
14 Nov 2017, 2:22 pm
One particularly relevant case on this issue is the case of Bourne v. [read post]
21 May 2007, 7:14 pm
After the Times’ series, “Your courts, their secrets,” ran last year, Washington courts have become much more reluctant to make court filings non-public.The Western District case of Bourne International, Inc. v. [read post]
