Search for: "Bowman v. Not Applicable" Results 21 - 40 of 177
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Jan 2015, 5:30 am by The Public Employment Law Press
The Third Department sustained the Board’s decision, explaining that the Fourth Department did not hold that the City had established that Bowman actually resided and normally slept at a residence outside the City but rather the Fourth Department concluded that, under the extremely deferential standard that was applicable upon review — whether the City's initial determination was arbitrary and capricious or an abuse of discretion, it could not conclude that there… [read post]
18 Nov 2014, 11:15 am by Arthur F. Coon
The second recent example is the Second Appellate District’s published opinion filed October 23, 2014 in Bowman v. [read post]
18 Feb 2013, 6:11 am by Marissa Miller
This weekend’s clippings highlight some of the Court’s upcoming cases, with an emphasis on this week’s oral arguments in Bowman v. [read post]
4 Oct 2022, 6:20 pm
Not that the barque twists and turns of the application of the doctrine has not served the interests of judicial majorities of the Supreme Court when it suited them--even as a means of protecting the populace form religious expression that might not represent the views of a majority. [read post]
14 Apr 2014, 1:52 pm by James Pugh
Simply stated: “[a] collateral attack is not a substitute for an appeal” reasoned the Second Appellate District Court in Bowman v. [read post]
7 Jan 2010, 3:02 am by John Day
 Here is a nice summary of that law from Bowman v. [read post]
12 Feb 2023, 7:04 am by Benjamin Goh
Google and Centripetal v. [read post]
14 Oct 2019, 7:56 am by Gyi Tsakalakis
To me, the key to making good DIY v outsourcing decisions is to get informed. [read post]
14 Oct 2019, 7:56 am by Gyi Tsakalakis
To me, the key to making good DIY v outsourcing decisions is to get informed. [read post]