Search for: "Brand v. Ford Motor Company"
Results 21 - 40
of 62
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Aug 2019, 7:00 am
In that case, the Dodge brothers, founders of Dodge Motors, and stockholders of Ford Motor Co., sued Ford Motor Co. alleging that Henry Ford’s decision to reinvest the company’s profits to cut the price of the Model T Ford and raise the wages of his workers was an incorrect decision. [read post]
2 Apr 2018, 4:34 am
Ford Motor Co., 119 Cal.App.3d 757 (1981) and the Tobacco Master Settlement Agreement (1998).) [read post]
2 Mar 2018, 1:29 pm
Ford, when the Dodge brothers, investors in Ford Motor Company at the time, sued Henry Ford and won because the Dodge brothers were stockholders and Henry Ford decided to reinvest profits and retain cash instead of giving dividends to the investors. [read post]
11 Apr 2017, 3:01 pm
CSR now encompasses not only what companies do with their profits, but also how they make them in virtually every respect of their operations. [read post]
11 Aug 2016, 4:04 am
Have you or a loved one been injured in a motor vehicle accident? [read post]
20 May 2016, 11:20 am
The Ford decision is reported at Columbia Motor Car Co. v. [read post]
22 Oct 2015, 2:59 pm
Selden and the decision in question is Columbia Motor Car Co. v. [read post]
10 Jun 2015, 3:00 am
Ford Motor Co., 28 USPQ2d 1471, 1475 (CD Cal. 1993). [read post]
17 Apr 2015, 2:54 am
Back on topic: I was tickled to death to see that Ford Motor Company was vindicated last Friday in the telecommuting/accommodation lawsuit brought by the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission. [read post]
15 Apr 2015, 12:40 am
The trade mark holder hopes that consumers will use the products identified by the mark, including the hashtag slogan; he can build upon the hashtag slogan to redirect users to the company’s website and social networks, where their brand allegiance can be reinforced. [read post]
12 Jan 2015, 1:39 am
Ford wheel of fortune spins as CJEU faces spare part questions Case C-500/14 Ford Motor Company is a new reference for a preliminary ruling to the Court of Justice of the European Union made by the District Court of Turin. [read post]
10 Nov 2014, 1:36 am
: Ford Denied Well-Known Trademark Protection in RussiaRussia’s Intellectual Property Court upheld a March decision by the country’s IP Office (Federal Service for Intellectual Property - Rospatent) to deny the Ford Motor Company's (FMC) application for well-known trademark protection for its company name and its iconic blue oval logo. [read post]
7 May 2014, 6:00 am
As shown in the file histories, extensions of time to oppose were filed by Ford Motor Company, who happens to still own active registrations for the well-known and antiquated MODEL T. [read post]
18 Feb 2014, 1:51 pm
First approach: MODEL E is an obvious member, or future member, of the Ford Motor Company “MODEL X” “family of marks. [read post]
12 Dec 2013, 8:08 am
(Pity the Ford Motor Co., losing so much from resales!) [read post]
31 Oct 2013, 8:53 am
Ford Motor Co. fared particularly poorly. [read post]
21 Feb 2012, 8:38 am
According to an article in the tremendously useful Reader’s Watchdog column on DesMoinesRegister.com, a gentleman named Jim Stone gave Anchor Motor Company Inc. [read post]
17 Jan 2012, 12:00 pm
Supp. 2d 284, 289 (S.D.N.Y. 2002) (“In fact the counterclaims, alleging unfair competition and interference with competitive advantage, were used to argue (albeit unsuccessfully) that the injunction application was barred by the doctrine of unclean hands, see Ford Motor Co. v. [read post]
17 Jan 2012, 6:00 am
Supp. 2d 284, 289 (S.D.N.Y. 2002) (“In fact the counterclaims, alleging unfair competition and interference with competitive advantage, were used to argue (albeit unsuccessfully) that the injunction application was barred by the doctrine of unclean hands, see Ford Motor Co. v. [read post]
22 Dec 2011, 12:40 pm
Crossroads Ford Truck Sales, Inc. v. [read post]
