Search for: "Brinker v. United States"
Results 21 - 37
of 37
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Mar 2013, 7:59 pm
Chinese Daily News, Inc. took its latest turn today, when the Ninth Circuit, on remand from the United States Supreme Court, issued the most decision in Wang v. [read post]
13 Mar 2013, 7:57 pm
Chinese Daily News, Inc. took its latest turn today, when the Ninth Circuit, on remand from the United States Supreme Court, issued the most decision in Wang v. [read post]
7 Jul 2011, 2:51 pm
” Brinker Restaurant Corp v. [read post]
8 Jun 2017, 12:00 pm
(Brinker Restaurant Corporation v. [read post]
6 Feb 2013, 8:42 am
Although Judge Zouhary had ordered the parties to brief the impact, if any, of the Brinker v. [read post]
9 Oct 2017, 7:01 am
Brinker Int’l, Inc. [read post]
1 Mar 2010, 8:28 am
As the court explained in Arellano v. [read post]
31 Jan 2013, 6:55 am
Ten days after Outland was decided, the United States District Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit determined that the President Obama’s recess appointments in January 2012 were illegal and therefore NLRB has not had a working quorum since the end of Member Becker’s term at the end of December, 2011. [read post]
12 Mar 2013, 12:27 pm
In his February 26, 2013 decision in J.K.C. v T.W.C. [read post]
21 Apr 2011, 9:00 am
” Webster’s Third New Int’l Unabridged Dictionary 1560 (1986); see also United States v. [read post]
3 Apr 2024, 8:44 am
Brinker International, Inc. v. [read post]
19 Nov 2012, 1:42 pm
The Court may well look to the California Supreme Court’s Brinker v. [read post]
18 Nov 2012, 3:39 pm
The Court may well look to the California Supreme Court’s Brinker v. [read post]
19 Nov 2012, 11:26 am
The Court may well look to the California Supreme Court’s Brinker v. [read post]
18 Oct 2011, 10:29 am
V 16. [read post]
9 Jun 2017, 11:54 pm
The court in United Parcel Service, Inc. v. [read post]
24 May 2010, 4:54 pm
As detailed in previous blog posts, the development of meal and rest break provisions is otherwise in somewhat of a holding pattern due to the looming California Supreme Court decision, Brinker Restaurant Corp. v. [read post]
