Search for: "Broadband, LLC"
Results 21 - 40
of 171
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Apr 2021, 9:23 pm
Atlantic Broadband Group, LLC, et al., (D.DE., Apr. 19, 2021), the district court considered the admissibility of previous IPR testimony to an infringement case. [read post]
5 Mar 2021, 1:45 pm
Trinko, LLP, and Credit Suisse Securities (USA) LLC v. [read post]
17 Feb 2021, 2:39 pm
United States (Sacred Sites; Oak Flat/Chi-chil Bildagoteel) Allegany Capital Enteprises, LLC v. [read post]
1 Dec 2020, 9:03 am
” PPC Broadband, Inc. v. [read post]
26 Oct 2020, 2:00 am
In many areas lacking broadband Internet access, Americans rely on smartphone data to connect to the Web. [read post]
26 Oct 2020, 2:00 am
In many areas lacking broadband Internet access, Americans rely on smartphone data to connect to the Web. [read post]
25 Sep 2020, 4:03 pm
IndiaYouTube, LLC v. [read post]
26 Aug 2020, 2:08 pm
Mnuchin (CARES Act) State Courts Bulletinhttps://www.narf.org/nill/bulletins/state/2020.htmlIrv's Boomin' Fireworks, LLC v. [read post]
19 Feb 2020, 11:27 am
., one of NOAA’s largest science and technology contractors, together with Hughes Network Systems LLC, the Germantown-based broadband satellite networks and services company, announced Wednesday their selection by the National Weather Service (NWS) to upgrade and expand managed satellite and wireless services at NWS locations in the contiguous United States, Hawaii, Alaska, and Pacific Region. [read post]
17 Jan 2020, 12:57 pm
Franchise Tax Board (California Court of Appeal opinion against the FTB finding that taxpayer’s passive holding of a 0.2% membership interest, with no right of control over the business affairs of the LLC, was insufficient to meet California’s doing business standard).31 FTB Notice 2017-01 (informing taxpayers and their representatives that the FTB will follow Swart only in situations with the same facts—i.e., 0.2 % membership interest).32 Appeal of Satview… [read post]
9 Sep 2019, 8:05 am
The OTA previously granted a similar appeal in the Matter of the Appeal of Satview Broadband, Ltd., OTA Case No. 18010756 (Sept. 25, 2018), which was released as “nonprecedential” and previously covered in Pillsbury’s Legal Alert. [read post]
9 Sep 2019, 8:05 am
The OTA previously granted a similar appeal in the Matter of the Appeal of Satview Broadband, Ltd., OTA Case No. 18010756 (Sept. 25, 2018), which was released as “nonprecedential” and previously covered in Pillsbury’s Legal Alert. [read post]
6 Sep 2019, 3:00 am
Weber’s activities at Mercury LLC have been under scrutiny by federal prosecutors in New York investigating whether he and others complied with laws requiring those working for a foreign country or political party to register with the Justice Department. [read post]
16 Jul 2019, 1:44 pm
Hughes Network Systems LLC, a Germantown-based provider of broadband satellite networks and services, announced Tuesday it was awarded a NASPO (National Association of State Procurement Officials) ValuePoint contract to deliver HughesNet for Business to state agencies and eligible political subdivisions. [read post]
2 May 2019, 11:21 am
Broadband satellite company Germantown-based Hughes Network Systems LLC announced Thursday a partnership with Facebook to launch HughesNet Wi-Fi Hotspots throughout Brazil and Mexico, supported by the Facebook Express Wi-Fi platform. [read post]
29 Apr 2019, 1:38 pm
Germantown-based broadband satellite networks and services company Hughes Network Systems LLC Monday launched high-speed satellite Internet service for consumers and businesses in Chile. [read post]
16 Apr 2019, 5:19 pm
In the Matter of the Appeal of Satview Broadband Ltd., OTA Case No. 18010756 (Sept. 25, 2018). [read post]
26 Mar 2019, 4:15 pm
Internet broadband providers and related entities seeking information the agency will use to examine how broadband companies collect, retain, use, and disclose information about consumers and their devices. [read post]
18 Mar 2019, 5:30 pm
WisconsinIn Tetra Tech EC Inc. and Lower Fox River Remediation LLC v. [read post]
30 Dec 2018, 3:03 am
" The appellate court said that as it stood, Cox wasn't entitled to rely on safe harbor because it did very little (if anything) even when told about repeat offenders, re-affirming the jury decision that sided with BMG and awarded $25 million against Cox when they found the broadband carrier liable for piracy by its subscribers, even if over turning that decision. [read post]
