Search for: "Brown v. Grant" Results 21 - 40 of 3,971
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 May 2024, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
Nervo, J.), entered June 2, 2022, which granted defendants' and intervenor defendant's motions to dismiss the amended complaint on the ground that it did not present a justiciable controversy.Sidley Austin LLP, New York (Melissa ColÓn-Bosolet, Eamon P. [read post]
1 May 2024, 4:00 am by Eric Segall
 The Court's rejection of the efforts by school officials to bring more racial diversity to their public schools was short on text, history, and tradition, but did erroneously rely, incredibly, on the plaintiffs’ brief in Brown v. [read post]
30 Apr 2024, 3:12 pm by Bill Marler
 Sources, Characteristics and Identification E. coli is an archetypal commensal bacterial species that lives in mammalian intestines. [read post]
26 Apr 2024, 11:39 am by Scott Bomboy
Supreme Court tackled a question “for the ages” in the Trump v. [read post]
25 Apr 2024, 3:16 pm by Mark Walsh
Bush, was here Monday for the big argument in City of Grants Pass v. [read post]
22 Apr 2024, 2:49 pm by Amy Howe
” Much of Monday’s argument focused on the Supreme Court’s 1962 ruling in Robinson v. [read post]
22 Apr 2024, 4:01 am by Deanne Sowter
The first two orders were by consent; the first granted the father one overnight stay with the child per week, and the second, two overnights per week. [read post]
21 Apr 2024, 2:35 pm
Brown, 564 U.S. 915,919 (2011) (distinguishing “general or all-purpose jurisdiction, and specific or case-linked jurisdiction”. [read post]
19 Apr 2024, 7:28 am by John Elwood
Texas, involving alleged sex discrimination in juror selection (over the dissent of Justice Sonia Sotomayor, joined by Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson); six-time relist McKesson v. [read post]
15 Apr 2024, 9:01 pm by renholding
Those third parties included Senator Cynthia Lummis (R-WY), the Blockchain Association, Katie Cox and Professors Peter Conti-Brown, Morgan Ricks,3Julie Andersen Hill and David Zaring.4 In his amicus brief, former Senator Toomey stated that the purpose for his amendment requiring the Federal Reserve Board to maintain a database was to increase the transparency and public accountability of the Federal Reserve Banks’ master account approval… [read post]