Search for: "Burden v. Thomas"
Results 21 - 40
of 2,229
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Jun 2024, 6:00 am
Decided and Entered:June 6, 2024 CV-23-1696 [*1]In the Matter of Thomas Hart et al., Petitioners, v Town of Guilderland Industrial Development Agency et al., Respondents. [read post]
9 Jun 2024, 9:00 pm
Circuit’s decision in Blassingame v. [read post]
8 Jun 2024, 8:33 am
‘Now is the time to reassess presumption of parental involvement’, writes Lea Levine in the April issue of the journal[1]. [read post]
6 Jun 2024, 1:54 pm
ShareJustice Clarence Thomas’s opinion for a unanimous court on Thursday in Connelly v. [read post]
29 May 2024, 4:00 am
Thomas says the following about Brown v. [read post]
23 May 2024, 1:23 pm
Justice Clarence Thomas filed an opinion concurring in part with the majority. [read post]
21 May 2024, 8:36 pm
Smith, a decision that required courts to deferentially review laws that burden religion. [read post]
15 May 2024, 7:51 am
Impression Products, Inc. v. [read post]
15 May 2024, 6:00 am
"Legislative enactments enjoy a strong presumption of constitutionality and parties challenging a duly enacted statute face the initial burden of demonstrating the statute's invalidity beyond a reasonable doubt" (Delgado v State of New York, 194 AD3d 98, 103 [3d Dept 2021] [internal quotation marks and citations omitted], affd 39 NY3d 242 [2022]; see Center for Jud. [read post]
15 May 2024, 6:00 am
"Legislative enactments enjoy a strong presumption of constitutionality and parties challenging a duly enacted statute face the initial burden of demonstrating the statute's invalidity beyond a reasonable doubt" (Delgado v State of New York, 194 AD3d 98, 103 [3d Dept 2021] [internal quotation marks and citations omitted], affd 39 NY3d 242 [2022]; see Center for Jud. [read post]
10 May 2024, 9:00 am
Tallent of counsel), for appellants.The West Firm, PLLC, Albany (Thomas S. [read post]
10 May 2024, 9:00 am
Tallent of counsel), for appellants.The West Firm, PLLC, Albany (Thomas S. [read post]
9 May 2024, 2:41 pm
(Reason)Today, in Culley v. [read post]
19 Apr 2024, 12:13 pm
In Muldrow v. [read post]
18 Apr 2024, 3:57 am
Nemiroff Intellectual Property Establishment v. [read post]
13 Apr 2024, 3:33 pm
Prelude to Litigation Phenylpropanolamine (PPA) was a widely used direct α-adrenergic agonist used as a medication to control cold symptoms and to suppress appetite for weight loss.[1] In 1972, an over-the-counter (OTC) Advisory Review Panel considered the safety and efficacy of PPA-containing nasal decongestant medications, leading, in 1976, to a recommendation that the agency label these medications as “generally recognized as safe and effective. [read post]
9 Apr 2024, 3:52 pm
Schmid and V. [read post]
9 Apr 2024, 7:03 am
By Thomas A. [read post]
8 Apr 2024, 10:08 am
As a practical matter, the burden shifts to the party that wishes to challenge the relied upon facts and data to learn more about the cited studies to show that the facts and data are not sufficient under Rule 702(b), and that the testimony is not the product of reliable methods under Rule 702(c). [read post]
5 Apr 2024, 3:41 pm
And Carson v. [read post]