Search for: "Burke v. State of Texas"
Results 21 - 40
of 86
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Aug 2010, 12:43 pm
Texas also has failed to address the Atkins ruling through state legislation. [read post]
24 Sep 2014, 5:38 am
” Has the US Marshals Service never heard of Brady v. [read post]
20 Sep 2017, 12:58 pm
Texas. [read post]
20 Sep 2017, 12:58 pm
Texas. [read post]
1 Apr 2010, 8:30 am
The issue of apparent authority arose: KCI stated that neither Girouard nor Burke had authority to decide on his own whether KCI would conduct infringement litigation, although ITI disputed this point. (...) [read post]
1 May 2020, 6:02 am
Katz, and Sabastian V. [read post]
11 Aug 2010, 6:23 am
Since 2001 when the Georgia Supreme Court decided State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. v. [read post]
30 Jul 2022, 6:01 am
Anderson sat down with Derek Muller to discuss the independent state legislature doctrine in light of the pending Supreme Court case Moore v. [read post]
9 Apr 2012, 6:12 pm
Texas), it is difficult to characterize the Court's action as adding a "veto gate" for laws (typically state laws) that were enacted decades earlier. [read post]
29 Mar 2011, 7:59 am
Arizona and the 2004 Supreme Court ruling in Schriro v. [read post]
27 Jun 2018, 4:20 am
Perez, in which the court on Monday largely upheld Texas’ federal congressional and state legislative maps against a racial-gerrymandering challenge. [read post]
9 Nov 2009, 5:00 am
These cases are: Burke v. [read post]
11 May 2020, 10:57 am
• While those are the means by which a party can compel attorneys’ fees discovery in Texas state court practice, parties may agree by Rule 11 to exchange fee information (billing statements) or agree to stipulations on whether a particular rate or an amount is reasonable while preserving a global objection to the right to recover fees. [read post]
31 Mar 2011, 8:17 am
Burks v. [read post]
5 Jan 2023, 6:17 pm
Lee v. [read post]
7 Nov 2014, 5:52 am
Law Div. 2005).Heeding presumptions are something that exists in some states (Massachusetts, Missouri, Oklahoma), doesn’t in others (California, Connecticut, Alabama), and is limited in still others (New, Jersey, Pennsylvania, Texas). [read post]
5 Nov 2017, 6:02 am
In a 2013 state AG enforcement action against Midland for illegal debt collection practices, its servicer, and its parent company, the Texas Attorney General averred that the price Midland pays is 3.3% of the face value of the debt.Excerpt from State's Amended Original Petition in Cause No, 2011-40626 - STATE OF TEXAS (ACTING BY AND THROUGH ATTORNEY GEN vs. [read post]
23 Jul 2017, 9:20 pm
Texas, a 4-4 decision about former President Obama’s immigration deportation policy, and Friedrichs v. [read post]
5 Nov 2017, 6:02 am
In a 2013 enforcement action against Midland, its servicer, and its parent company, the Texas Attorney General averred that the price Midland pays is 3.3% of the face value of the debt.Excerpt from State's Amended Original Petition in Cause No, 2011-40626 - STATE OF TEXAS (ACTING BY AND THROUGH ATTORNEY GEN vs. [read post]
24 Sep 2009, 5:09 am
Nissan Motor Co., 139 F.3d 599, 602 (8th Cir. 1999) (applying Nebraska law); Burke v. [read post]
