Search for: "CENTOCOR RESEARCH " Results 21 - 31 of 31
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Sep 2012, 7:19 am by Sarah Tran
Drafted by Derik Sanders (dtsanders@smu.edu), a 2014 Juris Doctor Candidate at SMU Dedman School of Law and research assistant to Professor Sarah Tran. [read post]
11 Nov 2011, 11:55 am by Bexis
At worst, a terse denial of the motion without prejudice would have been warranted.But no, Murthy leapt in with both feet, preempting, as it were, the prerogatives of the Texas Supreme Court to declare the law of Texas:Given the underlying justifications for the learned intermediary doctrine, the Court believes that the Texas Supreme Court will likely agree with the Court of Appeals’ reasoning in Centocor, Inc.2011 U.S. [read post]
11 Mar 2010, 12:23 pm by Beck, et al.
The doctor provided explicit, uncontroverted testimony that, even when provided with the most current research and FDA mandated warnings, he still would have proscribed Paxil for [the decedent’s] depression. [read post]
10 Jun 2011, 4:09 pm
" Centocor Ortho Biotech, Inc. v. [read post]
9 Apr 2015, 11:59 am by Lawrence B. Ebert
Rev. 1571, 1582, 1607 (2009), which mentions --   I thank Josh Walker, Mark Lemley, and the underwriters of the Stanford IP Litigation Clearinghouse for making this research possible-- but does not mention Eolas or Ariad. [read post]
29 May 2014, 5:00 am
Centocor, Inc., 2007 WL 4119054, at *1 (E.D. [read post]
1 Oct 2009, 2:14 am
We've done so many posts on removal - for you non-lawyers that means moving cases that were originally filed in state court into federal court - that even we have a hard time keeping track. [read post]
28 Apr 2011, 3:18 pm by Bexis
By now Restatement (Second) of Torts §402A (1965) is so old as to be thought of as somewhat antediluvian. [read post]