Search for: "CHEVRON USA PRODUCTS COMPANY"
Results 21 - 40
of 45
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Dec 2019, 11:18 am
In 2009, Mint became a division of Intuit, which already had a competing product with a much larger team. [read post]
18 Mar 2019, 5:30 pm
Supreme Court to “reconsider” the seminal administrative law doctrine known as Chevron deference35 in a concurring opinion in Pereira v. [read post]
27 Oct 2021, 5:15 am
Chevron Oronite Company LLC, No. 21-350 (mid-Arthrex issue, potential for GVR with instructions for PTO Director to place his imprint on the decision); and Bongiorno v. [read post]
5 Oct 2010, 2:58 pm
Circuit’s March 2, 2010 decision in Teva Pharms USA, Inc. v. [read post]
18 Mar 2024, 6:00 am
” 15 The remaining “lesser” or “non-core” factors included the amount of skill required for the work, the degree of permanence of the working relationship between the worker and the putative employer, and whether the work is part of an integrated unit of production. 16 The 2021 IC Rule further provided that it was “highly unlikely” that these non-core factors could outweigh the combined probative value of the core factors. 17 The Final Rule rescinds… [read post]
3 May 2016, 1:42 am
Petitions Granted: SCA Hygiene Products Aktiebolag v. [read post]
2 Jan 2020, 11:51 am
Chevron USA, Inc., Case No. 19-30492. [read post]
2 Jan 2020, 11:51 am
Chevron USA, Inc., Case No. 19-30492. [read post]
2 Jan 2020, 11:51 am
Chevron USA, Inc., Case No. 19-30492. [read post]
20 Sep 2021, 3:31 pm
Chevron Oronite Company LLC (post-arthrex timing issue) Utility: Hu v. [read post]
17 Feb 2014, 4:36 am
Gives them the moral high ground, erases Chevron deference. [read post]
26 May 2021, 4:09 pm
Chevron Texaco (09-15641); Kiobel v Royal Dutch Petroleum Co., 133 S. [read post]
11 Jun 2020, 11:30 pm
The litigation is In re Taxotere (Docetaxel) Products Liability Litigation, a multi-district litigation (MDL) proceeding before Judge Jane Triche Milazzo, who sits on the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana. [read post]
29 Nov 2007, 7:45 am
Basically, the company (or those responsible) can go to jail or be fined lots of money, and the product can be removed from the market. [read post]
25 Jul 2008, 10:51 am
In Philip Morris USA v. [read post]
28 Jul 2015, 1:34 pm
Importantly, Chevron U.S.A. [read post]
22 Dec 2015, 3:24 pm
**Nestle Defends Class Action in the Central District of California with Successful Motion to Dismiss and Sets Valuable Precedent With California Transparency in Supply Chains Act Safe Harbor Defense** . . . [read post]
21 Dec 2009, 5:24 am
(Business IP and Intangible Asset Report and Blog) Global - Patents New exchange, Intellectual Property Exchange International, can be a game-changer, but will need good patents to thrive (IAM) (Technology Transfer Tactics) Australia Bittersweet decision for Mars but Cadbury settles purple dispute: Mars Australia Pty Ltd v Sweet Rewards Pty Ltd (Managing IP) (ipwars) Belgium Belgian Supreme Court prohibits fishing expeditions: Ineos Manufacturing Belgium NV and Ineos Services… [read post]
3 May 2010, 9:30 pm
The administrative order signed by the company requires it to follow a schedule of clean up agreed to by EPA and the company. [read post]
14 Feb 2014, 12:00 pm
Official Committee of Unsecured Creditors of Quebecor World (USA) Inc. v. [read post]
