Search for: "COCA-COLA BOTTLING CO." Results 21 - 40 of 162
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Nov 2018, 8:18 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Coca-Cola Co., 2018 WL 6039325, No. 17 Civ. 7952 (LLS) (S.D.N.Y. [read post]
4 Jul 2018, 1:30 pm by Matthew Scott Johnson
Brie Sherwin’s article Chocolate, Coca-Cola, and Fracturing Fluid is cited in Case study: Bisphenol-A, RODGERS ENVIRONMENTAL LAW, 2d. [read post]
27 Apr 2018, 12:26 pm
At the Coca-Cola website, I see the company wanted a distinctive bottle (so it could fight off trademark infringers — e.g., Koka-Nola, Ma Coca-Co, Toka-Cola, and Koke):On April 26, 1915, the Trustees of the Coca-Cola Bottling Association voted to expend up to $500 to develop a distinctive bottle for Coca-Cola. [read post]
17 Apr 2018, 12:09 pm by Mavrick Law Firm
Coca Cola Bottling Co., 260 F.3d 257, 261 (3d Cir. 2001) (“Title VII does not prohibit discrimination based on sexual orientation”); Wrightson v. [read post]
4 Mar 2018, 12:59 pm by Sabrina I. Pacifici
Coca-Cola has promised to collect and recycle the equivalent of all the drinks containers it shifts each year, including 110bn plastic bottles. [read post]
27 Nov 2017, 3:30 am by Eric B. Meyer
Philadelphia Coca Cola Bottling Co.), which held that “Title VII does not prohibit discrimination based on sexual orientation. [read post]
12 Sep 2017, 7:46 am by Sergio F. Oehninger and Tae Andrews
Coca-Cola’s insurers moved to dismiss its claim for attorneys’ fees on the basis that Coca-Cola had failed to state a claim for which relief may granted. [read post]
12 Sep 2017, 7:46 am by Sergio F. Oehninger
Coca-Cola’s insurers moved to dismiss its claim for attorneys’ fees on the basis that Coca-Cola had failed to state a claim for which relief may granted. [read post]