Search for: "CSEA v. Doe"
Results 21 - 40
of 70
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Jul 2021, 4:00 am
Attorneys for Plaintiffs CSEA, Inc. [read post]
22 Sep 2008, 12:02 pm
Further, said the court, the record before it "does not include transcripts of the disciplinary hearing," and thus the record "is insufficient for us to decide whether the determination of the Town of Somers was supported by substantial evidence. [read post]
24 Nov 2010, 3:48 am
Claim of mistake does not permit a party to rescind provisions set out in collective bargaining agreementPlattsburgh v Plattsburgh Police Officers Union, 250 AD2d 327, motion to appeal denied, 93 NY2d 807Disabled firefighters and disabled police officers are entitled to significantly different benefits under New York’s General Municipal Law, Sections 207-a (firefighters) and 207-c (police officers).If a police collective bargaining agreement dealing with disability benefits… [read post]
26 Jul 2018, 4:00 am
In the Matter of the Arbitration between Unit 8251, Local 842, CSEA v City of Troy, the basic issue was the effect of an employee's pre-arbitration resignation on his or her right to demand arbitration. [read post]
9 Apr 2019, 4:00 am
Lockport subsequently promoted Petitioner to a position in a collective bargaining unit represented by the Civil Service Employees Association [CSEA]. [read post]
9 Apr 2019, 4:00 am
Lockport subsequently promoted Petitioner to a position in a collective bargaining unit represented by the Civil Service Employees Association [CSEA]. [read post]
13 Jul 2018, 4:00 am
"* It should be noted that in CSEA v Lakeland Central School District, 230 A.D.2d 703, the Appellate Division rejected Lakeland's theory that CSEA’s action for damages “for breach of a collective bargaining agreement” should be dismissed because CSEA had not complied with the “notice of claim” requirements set out in §3813 of the Education Law. [read post]
10 Feb 2010, 3:35 am
’”Such a provision, said the Appellate Division, has been held to mandates vacatur of an arbitration award granting relief based on a grievance that was presented after expiration of the limitation period set forth in the governing collective bargaining agreement, citing Nassau Health Care Corp. v CSEA, 20 AD3d 401.Notwithstanding this, however, the Appellate Division ruled that while Local 832 failed to commence the formal grievance process within the time frame… [read post]
8 Apr 2009, 4:15 am
[c]ontrary to, or inconsistent with, or modifying or varying in any way, the terms of [the CBA].'" Such a provision, said the Appellate Division, has been held to mandates vacatur of an arbitration award granting relief based on a grievance that was presented after expiration of the limitation period set forth in the governing collective bargaining agreement, citing Nassau Health Care Corp. v CSEA, 20 AD3d 401. [read post]
9 Jun 2010, 3:57 am
Out-of-title work Article 78 petition dismissed for failure to exhaust remedy provided in the collective bargaining agreementCSEA v Groton Cent. [read post]
26 Jul 2017, 4:00 am
" Further, as the court held in Trainosky v Civil Service Empls. [read post]
17 Feb 2010, 2:26 am
Union’s right to demand and obtain documents on file with the employer in a grievance procedure does not extend to disciplinary actionsMatter of Pfau v Public Empl. [read post]
1 Sep 2011, 3:29 am
The agreement, according to CSEA, “covers all unit members and does not distinguish between part-time and full-time employees with respect to health insurance benefits. [read post]
18 Mar 2009, 4:15 am
Union's right to demand and obtain documents on file with the employer in a grievance procedure does not extend to disciplinary actionsMatter of Pfau v Public Empl. [read post]
2 Feb 2010, 3:01 am
[see New York City Department of Education v Halpin, OATH Index #818/07]. [read post]
7 May 2009, 4:15 am
[see New York City Department of Education v Halpin, OATH Index #818/07]. [read post]
23 Jul 2012, 3:30 am
School Dists. v Zyra (51 AD3d 125, 130 [read post]
16 Jul 2018, 12:20 am
" It argued that any arbitration award in favor of the teachers association would violate law and public policy and thus be unenforceable.To support its position, the district cited a PERB ruling [CSEA and Eastchester UFSD, 29 PERB 3041]. [read post]
7 Aug 2011, 6:35 am
(See CSEA v. [read post]
14 May 2009, 4:17 am
Further, the ALJ found that CSEA's arguments that employees' privacy rights were affected, that they had to participate in record keeping, and that there was an interference with off duty time were either inapplicable or had no factual basis. [read post]
