Search for: "CSEA v. Doe"
Results 21 - 40
of 70
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 May 2020, 7:38 am
Two Commons Committees –the Home Affairs Committee and the Digital, Culture, Media and Sport Committee – have recently held evidence sessions with government Ministers discussing, among other things, the government’s proposed Online Harms legislation. [read post]
9 May 2020, 2:20 am
"Similarly, in Szumigala v Hicksville Union Free School District, 148 AD2d 621, the Appellate Division, citing Cheektowaga v Nyquest, 38 NY2d 137, held that a seniority clause in a Taylor Law agreement violated §2510 of the Education Law when it permitted seniority in different tenure areas to be combined for the purposes of determining seniority with the District for the purposes of layoff.However, in Gee v Board of Educ. of Rochester City Sch. [read post]
9 May 2020, 2:20 am
"Similarly, in Szumigala v Hicksville Union Free School District, 148 AD2d 621, the Appellate Division, citing Cheektowaga v Nyquest, 38 NY2d 137, held that a seniority clause in a Taylor Law agreement violated §2510 of the Education Law when it permitted seniority in different tenure areas to be combined for the purposes of determining seniority with the District for the purposes of layoff.However, in Gee v Board of Educ. of Rochester City Sch. [read post]
1 May 2020, 5:16 am
"Similarly, in Szumigala v Hicksville Union Free School District, 148 AD2d 621, the Appellate Division, citing Cheektowaga v Nyquest, 38 NY2d 137, held that a seniority clause in a Taylor Law agreement violated §2510 of the Education Law when it permitted seniority in different tenure areas to be combined for the purposes of determining seniority with the District for the purposes of layoff.However, in Gee v Board of Educ. of Rochester City Sch. [read post]
1 May 2020, 5:16 am
"Similarly, in Szumigala v Hicksville Union Free School District, 148 AD2d 621, the Appellate Division, citing Cheektowaga v Nyquest, 38 NY2d 137, held that a seniority clause in a Taylor Law agreement violated §2510 of the Education Law when it permitted seniority in different tenure areas to be combined for the purposes of determining seniority with the District for the purposes of layoff.However, in Gee v Board of Educ. of Rochester City Sch. [read post]
21 Oct 2019, 4:00 am
., Local 1000, AFSCME AFL-CIO v New York State Off. of Children & Family Servs., 174 AD3d 1206 [CSEA] and, similarly, in Ayers v City of Mount Vernon, Appellate Division, Second Department, 2019 NY Slip Op 07230 [Ayers], it appears that there some misunderstanding or misapplication of the words of art "permanent appointment" and "tenure" in determining the employment status of a public employee while he or she is serving a probationary… [read post]
21 Oct 2019, 4:00 am
., Local 1000, AFSCME AFL-CIO v New York State Off. of Children & Family Servs., 174 AD3d 1206 [CSEA] and, similarly, in Ayers v City of Mount Vernon, Appellate Division, Second Department, 2019 NY Slip Op 07230 [Ayers], it appears that there some misunderstanding or misapplication of the words of art "permanent appointment" and "tenure" in determining the employment status of a public employee while he or she is serving a probationary… [read post]
8 Jul 2019, 4:00 am
Matter of Burke v Bowen, 40 NY2d 264, 266-267 [1976]; cf. [read post]
9 Apr 2019, 4:00 am
Lockport subsequently promoted Petitioner to a position in a collective bargaining unit represented by the Civil Service Employees Association [CSEA]. [read post]
9 Apr 2019, 4:00 am
Lockport subsequently promoted Petitioner to a position in a collective bargaining unit represented by the Civil Service Employees Association [CSEA]. [read post]
26 Jul 2018, 4:00 am
In the Matter of the Arbitration between Unit 8251, Local 842, CSEA v City of Troy, the basic issue was the effect of an employee's pre-arbitration resignation on his or her right to demand arbitration. [read post]
16 Jul 2018, 12:20 am
" It argued that any arbitration award in favor of the teachers association would violate law and public policy and thus be unenforceable.To support its position, the district cited a PERB ruling [CSEA and Eastchester UFSD, 29 PERB 3041]. [read post]
13 Jul 2018, 4:00 am
"* It should be noted that in CSEA v Lakeland Central School District, 230 A.D.2d 703, the Appellate Division rejected Lakeland's theory that CSEA’s action for damages “for breach of a collective bargaining agreement” should be dismissed because CSEA had not complied with the “notice of claim” requirements set out in §3813 of the Education Law. [read post]
26 Jul 2017, 4:00 am
" Further, as the court held in Trainosky v Civil Service Empls. [read post]
6 Sep 2016, 7:00 am
Installing Global Positioning System equipment in devices use by employees during workEl-Nahal v. [read post]
15 Jan 2015, 4:00 am
CSEA appealed. [read post]
31 Mar 2014, 4:00 am
The Appellate Division noted that this contention was rejected by the Court of Appeals in Kolbe v Tibbets, 22 NY3d 344. [read post]
23 Jul 2012, 3:30 am
School Dists. v Zyra (51 AD3d 125, 130 [read post]
11 Jul 2012, 3:10 am
Seeking a court order to compel a public officer to perform his or her duty CSEA v Patchogue-Medford UFSD, 239 A.D.2d 415 CSEA v Patchogue-Medford UFSD, a case involving a demand to effect an appointment of an individual to a reclassified position, was characterized as an action “in the nature of mandamus. [read post]
19 Sep 2011, 3:54 am
Does this mean that Kennedy may be summarily dismissed? [read post]
