Search for: "Calhoun v. United States"
Results 21 - 40
of 136
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Dec 2021, 9:32 pm
See Inaugural Addresses of the Presidents of the United States, S.Doc. [read post]
10 Dec 2021, 12:53 pm
Perhaps nothing at all, says this Court....Houston Public Media reports on the decision.Then in the other challenge to the Texas law, United States v. [read post]
8 Dec 2021, 5:21 am
Indeed, in comments proffered on the release of the State Council White Paper Tian Peiyan, the deputy director of the Communist Party's Policy Research Office took great pains to contrast the Chinese path of democratic constitutionalism with that advanced by the United States and its larger camp. [read post]
9 Nov 2021, 8:10 am
United States ex rel. [read post]
8 Nov 2021, 8:26 am
" (Humeyra Pamuk and Simon Lewis, "Biden's democracy summit: Problematic invite list casts shadow on impact," Reuters (7 November 2021) ("'If the summit is to be anything more than just another meeting, each attendee, including the United States, will need to follow through on meaningful commitments on democracy and rights issues in the year ahead,"'said Annie Boyajian, vice president for policy and advocacy at Freedom House, a non-profit… [read post]
17 Jun 2021, 7:30 am
Calhoun in addition to those setting out a more nationalist vision of the Constitution. [read post]
18 May 2021, 7:29 am
The United State Supreme Court disagreed, holding the plain language of 28 U.S.C. [read post]
18 May 2021, 7:29 am
The United State Supreme Court disagreed, holding the plain language of 28 U.S.C. [read post]
20 Jan 2021, 2:52 pm
USA v. [read post]
20 Jan 2021, 2:52 pm
USA v. [read post]
3 Dec 2020, 6:44 am
”[8] The Louisiana expense attribution provisions outlined above are based on federal tax provisions aimed at preventing United States taxpayers from claiming deductions for amounts incurred to generate income not included in federal taxable income by the United States.[9] There are two Internal Revenue Code (“Code”) provisions on which the Louisiana law is based: Section 265, which addresses the treatment of interest expense… [read post]
22 Oct 2020, 5:01 am
From United States v. [read post]
Louisiana Legislature Calls Itself Into Second Extraordinary Session and Includes Certain Tax Issues
30 Sep 2020, 8:46 am
As in other states, Louisiana law requires employers to pay into an unemployment insurance fund to cover the cost of state unemployment benefits. [read post]
10 Aug 2020, 2:24 am
In addition to the temporal disconnect, the majority gave virtually no consideration to the three-way relationship between the product supplier defendants, the plaintiffs, and the plaintiffs’ employer, the United States government. [read post]
23 Jul 2020, 12:19 pm
To justify the removal of Taney’s bust, the bill declares that: While sitting in the United States Capitol, the Supreme Court issued the infamous Dred Scott v Sanford decision on March 6, 1857. [read post]
15 Jul 2020, 8:14 am
Case citation: United States v. [read post]
3 Jun 2020, 10:47 am
Supreme Court’s decision in Financial Oversight and Management Bd. v. [read post]
3 Jun 2020, 10:07 am
Supreme Court’s decision in Financial Oversight and Management Bd. v. [read post]
14 May 2020, 6:30 am
Calhoun’s own theory of secession was initially based on the plantation as the most fundamental unit of society rather than the individual, the family, or the state. [read post]
6 Apr 2020, 5:01 am
The Supreme Court of the United States has consistently held that states may not punish the publication of truthful matters by the media. [read post]
