Search for: "Campbell v. May et al" Results 21 - 40 of 147
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Mar 2012, 1:59 pm by Bill Ward
The court ruling was based on the condemnor’s failure to engage in bona fide negotiations as required by N.J.S.A. 20:3-6, et al., of the Eminent Domain Act. [read post]
19 Apr 2011, 11:41 am by Hull and Hull LLP
Specifically, they refer to the case Ekelshot-Kumelj, et al v. [read post]
30 Jan 2008, 6:28 am
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA NORTHERN DIVISION WILLIE MCNAIR, ) ) Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant, ) ) v. ) Case No. 2:06-cv-695-WKW ) RICHARD ALLEN, et al., )) Defendants/Counter-Plaintiffs. ) ___________________________________ ) JAMES CALLAHAN, )) Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant, ) ) v. ) Case No. 2:06-cv-919-WKW ) RICHARD ALLEN, et al., )) Defendants/Counter-Plaintiffs. ) MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER… [read post]
7 May 2024, 7:43 am by centerforartlaw
Source: USPTO  Rothschild moved to dismiss the complaint under the Second Circuit’s Rogers v. [read post]
7 Jan 2014, 7:46 am by Lawrence B. Ebert
WRIGHT ET AL., FEDERAL PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE § 2757 (3d ed. 2013). [read post]