Search for: "Cases Appealed to Supreme Court of Virginia" Results 21 - 40 of 4,627
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 May 2024, 3:00 am by Jim Sedor
Capitol was displayed outside a house owned by Supreme Court Justice Samuel Alito. [read post]
23 May 2024, 5:27 am by Jacob Ford Ridgeway
Adding to these challenges is the adoption by the Supreme Court of the “Major Questions Doctrine” in the 2022 case West Virginia v. [read post]
22 May 2024, 7:23 pm by Josh Blackman
Five months later, the Supreme Court granted cert in Obergefell v. [read post]
20 May 2024, 8:06 am by Guest Author
In Community Financial Services, such enhanced historical analysis did not occur until the case reached the Supreme Court. [read post]
20 May 2024, 5:01 am by Doriane Coleman
She appealed the CAS decision to the Swiss Federal Tribunal, where she lost; and the SFT's decision to the European Court of Human Rights, where she won an initial round—the en banc hearing on Switzerland's appeal is this month.) [read post]
19 May 2024, 9:05 pm by The Regulatory Review
Aug 29, 2023 | Could West Virginia v EPA Strengthen State Climate Laws | Scholars argue that a recent Supreme Court decision may bolster state climate lawsuits. [read post]
17 May 2024, 3:00 am by Jim Sedor
Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit. [read post]
9 May 2024, 7:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
Supreme Court has imposed a three-part test to determine whether a work is obscene:the average person ... would find that the work, taken as a whole, appeals to the prurient interest;the work depicts or describes, in a patently offensive way, sexual conduct specifically defined by the applicable state law; andthe work, taken as a whole, lacks serious literary, artistic, political, or scientific value.[5]The purpose of the third requirement is, as the Court… [read post]
9 May 2024, 7:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
Supreme Court has imposed a three-part test to determine whether a work is obscene:the average person ... would find that the work, taken as a whole, appeals to the prurient interest;the work depicts or describes, in a patently offensive way, sexual conduct specifically defined by the applicable state law; andthe work, taken as a whole, lacks serious literary, artistic, political, or scientific value.[5]The purpose of the third requirement is, as the Court… [read post]
8 May 2024, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
The New York Civil Liberties Union, Amicus Curiae, The New York City Bar Association, Amicus Curiae.Plaintiffs appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, New York County (Frank P. [read post]
8 May 2024, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
The New York Civil Liberties Union, Amicus Curiae, The New York City Bar Association, Amicus Curiae.Plaintiffs appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, New York County (Frank P. [read post]
6 May 2024, 8:31 am by fjhinojosa
Casto’s article The Early Supreme Court Justices’ Most Significant Opinion was cited in the following article: Joshua J. [read post]
6 May 2024, 5:00 am by Taylor Gulatsi
During his over three decades on the Supreme Court, Justice Oliver Wendell Holmes, Jr., developed a jurisprudence that echoed across the 20th century. [read post]
3 May 2024, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
Reilly, where the Supreme court invalidated restrictions on tobacco products on First Amendment grounds.[8]  One might assume that tobacco products have avoided meaningful regulation because of their widespread use and lobbying by politically powerful tobacco companies. [read post]
28 Apr 2024, 11:33 am by admin
The court found that Egilman had manipulated data to reach misleading conclusions, devoid of scientific validity.[5] Egilman was so distraught by being excluded that he sought to file a personal appeal to the United States Court of Appeal.[6] When the defendant-appellee opposed Egilman’s motion to intervene in the plaintiff’s appeal, Egilman stridently asserted his right to participate,[7] and filed his own declaration.[8] The declaration is… [read post]