Search for: "Center for Regulatory Reasonableness v. EPA"
Results 21 - 40
of 165
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Oct 2012, 10:34 pm
The Department of Agriculture withdrew the National Organic Program: Sunset Review for Nutrient Vitamins and Minerals final rule (admittedly economically significant), but no reason has been given. [read post]
25 Dec 2020, 9:03 pm
Three limitations restrict EPA’s regulatory authority over CAFOs. [read post]
27 Feb 2022, 3:03 pm
Background: The long-running fight over greenhouse-gas regulation The dispute at the center of West Virginia v. [read post]
28 Feb 2022, 2:08 pm
The case, West Virginia v. [read post]
21 Aug 2015, 11:50 am
Supreme Court (SCOTUS) sided with the petitioners in Michigan v. [read post]
2 Aug 2015, 5:30 am
EPA’s choice of which version of Section 111(d) to follow, however reasonable, could get zero deference. [read post]
2 Apr 2007, 11:45 am
EPA "recalls the previous high-water mark of diluted standing requirements, United States v. [read post]
23 May 2013, 8:12 am
At this blog, Lyle Denniston discusses nine pending cert. petitions regarding new EPA rules on greenhouse gases and observes that the petitions “could either turn into one of the biggest regulatory cases the Court has had in years, or could go nowhere because of the argument that the Supreme Court has already all but resolved the dispute. [read post]
28 Jul 2015, 1:34 pm
The judgment of the DC Circuit, White Stallion Energy Center, LLC v. [read post]
4 Feb 2014, 9:28 am
For obvious reasons, the EPA’s claimed authority to “tailor” the CAA was front and center in comments on the EPA Tailoring Rule rulemaking proceeding and in briefing in the D.C. [read post]
7 Jun 2023, 8:30 am
Bush Administration OIRA head Susan Dudley and former EPA policy official Brian Mannix write that, “[i]n principle, a benefit-cost analysis should be ‘complete. [read post]
6 Dec 2009, 9:11 pm
Click Here Center for Biological Diversity v. [read post]
November 30, 2009 – Environmental Law Settlements, Decisions, Regulatory Actions and Lawsuit Filings
30 Nov 2009, 9:25 am
Click Here California Appeals Court Affirms Lower Court Holding in Goodrich v. [read post]
29 Sep 2011, 12:28 pm
Access the complete posting from the Pew Center (click here). [read post]
18 Jul 2021, 9:08 pm
Had HollyFrontier posed the same kind of textual question but over EPA’s authority to impose regulatory obligations, would this Court have chosen the option that gave EPA greater discretion? [read post]
31 Aug 2023, 9:05 pm
Supreme Court’s recent ruling in Sackett v. [read post]
15 May 2015, 7:03 am
Pinkney v. [read post]
19 Mar 2022, 2:09 pm
The EPA’s assumptions in conducting and promulgating regulatory risk assessments are intended to predict the upper bound of theoretical risk, while fully acknowledging that there may be no actual risk in humans: “It should be emphasized that the linearized multistage [risk assessment] procedure leads to a plausible upper limit to the risk that is consistent with some proposed mechanisms of carcinogenesis. [read post]
December 14, 2009 – Environmental Law Settlements, Decisions, Regulatory Actions and Lawsuit Filings
13 Dec 2009, 8:58 pm
But the major debates will center on money: How could emission limits affect major industries and the jobs they provide? [read post]
16 Apr 2013, 10:18 am
Ecological Rights Foundation v. [read post]
