Search for: "Chamberlain v. State" Results 21 - 40 of 213
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Nov 2023, 2:36 am by INFORRM
On 16 November 2023, Chamberlain J heard an application for dismissal in the defamation case of Mir v Hussain KB-2022-004194. [read post]
29 Aug 2023, 6:11 am by Dan Bressler
” “High Court Rules That City Law Firm Breached Duties By Acting For Client Despite Conflict Of Interest And By Failing To Provide Adequate Costs Information Under CFA: Forster V Reynolds Porter Chamberlain [2023] EWHC 1150 (Ch)” — “In its recent decision in Forster v Reynolds Porter Chamberlain LLP, the High Court found that City law firm, RPC, had breached its duty of care to its client, Ms Forster, after failing to keep her… [read post]
12 May 2023, 12:06 pm by Will Korn
” Gomez, a shareholder in Chamberlain, Hrdlicka, White, Williams & Aughtry in Houston, is a trial attorney with extensive experience in civil lawsuits in state and federal courts. [read post]
1 May 2023, 7:46 am by INFORRM
On 25 April 2023, Chamberlain J handed down judgement in the data protection case of Ali v Chief Constable of Bedfordshire Police. [read post]
24 Apr 2023, 2:40 am by INFORRM
On 17 April 2023, the Washington State House concurred to the State Senate’s amendments to Washington State House Bill 1155, the My Health My Data Act. [read post]
17 Apr 2023, 5:50 am by INFORRM
The report stated that, on a specific setting, correct matches were made 89% of the time and there was no statistically significant gender or race bias. [read post]
14 Apr 2023, 4:52 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Bullock v Miller, 145 AD3d 1215, 1217-1218 [3d Dept 2016]; Miazga v Assaf, 136 AD3d 1131, 1134 [3d Dept 2016], lv dismissed 27 NY3d 1078 [2016]; Chamberlain, D’Amanda, Oppenheimer & Greenfield, LLP v Wilson, 136 AD3d 1326, 1328-1329 [4th Dept 2016], lv dismissed 28 NY3d 942 [2016]). [read post]
12 Apr 2023, 7:35 am by Cyberleagle
” A Lord Chamberlain for the internet? [read post]
3 Apr 2023, 2:22 am by INFORRM
On 29 March 2023, judgment was handed down by Saini J in the3million & Anor, R (On the Application Of) v Secretary of State for the Home Department & Anor [2023] EWHC 713 (Admin). [read post]
27 Mar 2023, 1:25 am by INFORRM
The News Media Association (NMA) and National Union of Journalists issued statements stating that the changes would “weaken the flow of information from police forces to the general public, undermining the public right to know. [read post]
20 Mar 2023, 2:56 am by INFORRM
United States On 15 March 2023, the Colorado Attorney General’s Office finalised the rules implementing the Colorado Privacy Act. [read post]
13 Mar 2023, 2:13 am by INFORRM
” 26 civil society groups, including Privacy International and Open Rights Group signed an open letter to Secretary of State, Michelle Donelan, stating that the “ill-considered proposals…endanger UK residents and UK data protection. [read post]
6 Mar 2023, 1:41 am by INFORRM
Data Privacy and Data Protection The Secretary of State for Science, Innovation and Technology Michelle Donelan has refuted a reported pause on consideration of the proposed Data Protection and Digital Information Bill. [read post]
27 Feb 2023, 9:47 am by INFORRM
On 21 to 23 February 2023, Chamberlain J heard applications in the case of AEP and others v The Labour Party (QB-2021-001074). [read post]
19 Feb 2023, 5:21 pm by INFORRM
On 16 February 2023 there was a statement in open court in the case of Paul and Clare Wylie v Channel 5 Broadcasting Limited before Chamberlain J. [read post]
8 Feb 2023, 7:36 am by INFORRM
On the same day, Chamberlain J heard an application in the case of VLM v LPB. [read post]
29 Jan 2023, 4:40 am by Frank Cranmer
Masterpiece Cakeshop again In Scardina v Masterpiece Cakeshop Inc (CO Ct App. [read post]
16 Jan 2023, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
In caselaw, lawyers and historians can rely on new historical evidence to challenge previous rulings, as the Organization for Americans Historians did in Obergefell v. [read post]
9 Jan 2023, 4:19 am by INFORRM
On 20 December 2022, Chamberlain J heard costs applications in Wright v McCormack. [read post]