Search for: "Chambers v. Anderson" Results 21 - 40 of 110
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 May 2022, 9:47 am by William Ford
The report notes that Congress’s reliance on outside counsel “began as far back as December 29, 1818, when the House adopted a resolution authorizing the Speaker to hire private counsel to defend the Sergeant at Arms in the landmark case of Anderson v. [read post]
11 Mar 2021, 2:33 pm by Lundgren & Johnson, PSC
More recently, the Supreme Court decided the case of Presley v. [read post]
22 Jan 2021, 6:00 am by Guest Blogger
App. 2000) (opinion withdrawn, but its author dissented from the en banc for this reason, 41 S.W.3d at 366-75 [Anderson, J.]). [read post]
16 Oct 2020, 7:37 am by Grant Tudor
Inherent contempt, or the authority of either chamber to punish nonmembers for obstructing its work, including for defiance of its subpoenas—upheld in early Supreme Court decisions (Anderson v. [read post]
6 Jul 2020, 9:44 am by Schachtman
”), aff’d sub nom., Juni v. [read post]
14 Jun 2020, 12:26 pm by Marty Lederman
  And certainly the "full chamber" has not identified such a legislative purpose at all, let alone "with sufficient particularity. [read post]
22 Apr 2020, 11:59 am by Scott R. Anderson, Pranay Vaddi
Several weeks ago, in early April 2020, Secretary of Defense Mark Esper and Secretary of State Mike Pompeo reportedly agreed to begin withdrawing the United States from the Treaty on Open Skies, a multilateral agreement that facilitates reconnaissance overflights among its members in order to promote military transparency. [read post]
7 Apr 2020, 4:13 am by INFORRM
” Those words are taken from the 1941 case of Liversidge v Anderson, an English case which many are now digging out and dusting off for its resonance with today’s circumstances. [read post]
21 Jan 2020, 3:43 am by Edith Roberts
The first is Shular v. [read post]
8 Nov 2019, 3:00 am by Jim Sedor
Nearly 60 percent of the 110 people who have moved to the Hill from the influence industry since the midterm election went to work for House Democrats, a likely result of the flurry of new jobs available after the party regained control of the chamber. [read post]