Search for: "Chance v. Commissioner of Correction"
Results 21 - 40
of 142
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Jun 2022, 5:05 pm
In a seminal discrimination case, Casteneda v. [read post]
27 Apr 2022, 1:12 pm
Fund, Inc. v Gantt, 796 F Supp 681, 684 [ED NY 1992]). [read post]
27 Apr 2022, 1:12 pm
Fund, Inc. v Gantt, 796 F Supp 681, 684 [ED NY 1992]). [read post]
26 Apr 2022, 5:40 am
People v. [read post]
8 Mar 2022, 5:00 am
Supreme Court’s statement in Reiter v. [read post]
26 Feb 2022, 6:53 pm
In a seminal 1977 discrimination case, Casteneda v. [read post]
28 Jan 2022, 3:00 am
Palin v. [read post]
24 Jan 2022, 1:49 pm
And the Department of Justice filed court briefing opposing religious exemptions under Title VII for a teacher who resigned after refusing to use transgender students’ correct names and pronouns. [read post]
5 Jan 2022, 9:29 am
Soon after World War I, a committee of the National Conference of Commissioners on Uniform State Laws started work on a model statute. [read post]
10 Dec 2021, 11:44 am
I have now had a chance to digest Whole Woman's Health v. [read post]
23 Sep 2021, 10:00 am
Pix Credit: Council of Europe--Paris Principles at 25. [read post]
9 Sep 2021, 9:13 pm
There's a lot of confusion about the Coinbase matter, so I'm going to spell out what the stakes are, how I think the product works, and then why (assuming that I have the product's operation correct) Lend is obviously a security. [read post]
28 Jul 2021, 8:49 am
In this post, Tim Sales, a partner in the Dispute Resolution team at CMS, and Hannah Jones, who works in the Tax team at CMS, comment on the decision handed down by the UK Supreme Court in the matter of R (on the application of Haworth) v Commissioners for Her Majesty’s Revenue and Customs [2021] UKSC 25. [read post]
13 Jul 2021, 9:17 am
” (R. v. [read post]
28 Jun 2021, 9:01 pm
V, § 48.2. [read post]
2 May 2021, 4:46 pm
Surveillance On 27 April the Biometrics and Surveillance Camera Commissioner published a FOI response. [read post]
21 Dec 2020, 5:01 am
It was not until 1961, in Monroe v. [read post]
27 Nov 2020, 1:46 am
On appeal from: [2018] EWCA Civ 2210 The Supreme Court has unanimously dismissed this appeal concerning the correct approach as to determining the value of non-negotiable chips for the purpose of calculating gaming duty. [read post]
28 Oct 2020, 9:16 am
” Similarly, in DNC v. [read post]
12 Oct 2020, 8:05 pm
Kennedy, Barack Obama and Mitt Romney, this year I also assigned two other readings: a 1998 article co-written by Amy V. [read post]
