Search for: "Chevron U.S.A. Holdings Inc." Results 21 - 40 of 177
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Oct 2015, 6:00 am by Steven G. Pearl
" Second, because the regulation was duly promulgated after a notice-and-comment period and has not changed since its promulgation in 1970, the Court reviewed the regulation under the "reasonableness" standard set forth in Chevron, U.S.A., Inc. v. [read post]
22 Jul 2008, 9:31 am
" Id. at 46719.Chevron does appear [a lot]:In holding that the Final Rules are ultra vires, the court made no effort to measure the Final Rules against the actual terms of Section 2(b)(2), nor did the court give the USPTO's interpretation of that provision the deference required by Chevron U.S.A., Inc. v. [read post]
20 Oct 2019, 9:05 pm by Randolph J. May
Under the Supreme Court’s 1984 decision in Chevron U.S.A., Inc. v. [read post]
18 Mar 2021, 10:52 am by Paul M. Hauge
(“Woodruff”), Gulf Oil Limited Partnership (“Gulf”), and Chevron U.S.A. [read post]
19 Mar 2015, 2:39 pm by Lawrence B. Ebert
§ 1.78) are applied (...)Yes, the Supreme Court Chevron case comes up:Judge Andrews' decision that HTC was correct in challenging the priority of the '105, '181, and '720 patents was based in his determination that the PTO was not entitled to deference under Chevron U.S.A., Inc. v. [read post]
7 Feb 2017, 9:01 pm by Michael C. Dorf
As I shall explain, Scalia was right and Gorsuch is wrong.The Chevron Doctrine and Justice ScaliaThe Chevron doctrine gets its name from a 1984 case, Chevron U.S.A., Inc. v. [read post]
4 Dec 2007, 11:11 pm
§ 4208(e) (2006).4  See Chevron, U.S.A., Inc. v. [read post]
26 Feb 2008, 12:31 pm
Davis, 531 U.S. 230 (2001) (exercise of categorical discretion) and Chevron, U.S.A., Inc. v. [read post]