Search for: "Christian v. ALL PERSONS CLAIMING ANY RIGHT"
Results 21 - 40
of 666
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 Jul 2016, 2:11 pm
This is a guest post by Allan Norman of Celtic Knot following the judgment of the Supreme Court in the case of The Christian Institute and others (Appellants) v The Lord Advocate (Respondent) (Scotland) [2016] UKSC 51. [read post]
7 Jun 2022, 6:05 am
From Murrey v. [read post]
22 May 2010, 6:23 am
Everson v. [read post]
24 Mar 2017, 7:24 am
Although the court granted summary judgment in her favor on her state-law marital status discrimination claim, it denied the parties’ cross motions for summary judgment on her state and federal gender and pregnancy bias claims (Richardson v. [read post]
4 May 2020, 7:23 am
Civil Rights Act of 1964. [read post]
15 Apr 2010, 11:56 am
Monday, the Supreme Court will hear one hour of oral argument in Christian Legal Society v. [read post]
14 Dec 2009, 10:24 am
Post by Mike Dorf with a Contribution by Michael McConnell My latest FindLaw column digs into last week's cert grant in Christian Legal Society v. [read post]
18 Feb 2013, 11:34 am
Any claim that they are not for the real good of actual human beings is rejected on the grounds of “rights” and “betterment” of human life and society. [read post]
23 Aug 2013, 6:41 am
Using this feed on any other site is a copyright violation. [read post]
23 Oct 2013, 9:23 am
(All right, never mind the catcalls -- we all know that what ECUSA practices these days is anything but the Christian religion -- see the remarks being made at the current GAFCON meeting in Nairobi.)In other words, how does the Church's attempt to claim title to the property and bank accounts of departing parishes and dioceses comport with the tenets of the Christian faith? [read post]
23 Aug 2016, 9:30 am
In that case, EEOC v. [read post]
24 Nov 2021, 7:19 am
The court reiterates that Section 230 doesn’t create a private right of action: “to the extent that it addresses private suits at all, Section 230 only uses ‘remedy-foreclosing’ language….in its broader context, Section 230’s ‘aggregate focus’ on promoting free speech online—rather than on ‘the needs of any particular person’—cautions against concluding that a private cause of action exists. [read post]
23 Mar 2016, 7:55 am
If you read the briefs in Simmons v. [read post]
8 Mar 2019, 10:46 am
They have assaulted his person. [read post]
24 Nov 2020, 12:02 pm
Cotten v. [read post]
7 Dec 2020, 3:46 pm
The question before the justices in Federal Republic of Germany v. [read post]
6 Dec 2022, 3:30 am
No longer are civil rights to be preserved for the individual against the government, but they are a weapon to be used against any person who fails to comport with “correct” beliefs and conduct as dictated by the powerful to control the individual. [read post]
10 May 2019, 11:37 am
Guarantor also waives any and all rights or defenses arising by reason of (A) any “one action” or “anti-deficiency” law or any other law which may prevent Lender from bringing any action, including a claim for def [read post]
22 Jan 2022, 12:44 pm
" … The contract on its face apparently applied to all litigation against the Church: My freely given consent to be bound exclusively by the discipline, faith, internal organization, and ecclesiastical rule, custom, and law of the Scientology religion … in all my dealings of any nature with the Church, and in all my dealings of any nature with any other Scientology church or organization which espouses, presents, propagates or… [read post]
20 May 2019, 10:00 pm
If any were discovered, the duty of care required immediate correction, or distinct warnings about them to any guests.Licensee. [read post]
