Search for: "Clapp v. Clapp"
Results 21 - 40
of 56
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Jan 2015, 3:17 am
In last week’s ruling, the appellate court affirmed the denial of dissolution under BCL § 1102 but reversed the grant of common-law dissolution and dismissed the petition, stating: “[T]he remedy of common-law dissolution is available only to minority shareholders who accuse the majority shareholders and/or the corporate officers or directors of looting the corporation and violating their fiduciary duty” (Matter of Sternberg [Osman], 181 AD2d 897, 897-898; see Matter of… [read post]
25 Jun 2012, 3:00 am
Clapp, Lewis v. [read post]
11 Nov 2018, 7:18 am
The published case report by Ratner helps demonstrate that Allen v. [read post]
30 Mar 2016, 3:42 pm
Batson v. [read post]
17 Jun 2014, 11:17 am
Uriarte v. [read post]
3 Nov 2013, 6:15 am
The SKAPP website tells us that this organization is guided and supported by an advisory committee, consisting of: Eula Bingham, PhDLes Boden, PhDRichard Clapp, DSc, MPHPolly Hoppin, ScDSheldon Krimsky, PhDDavid Michaels, PhD, MPHDavid Ozonoff, MD, MPHAnthony Robbins, MD, MPA Clapp is a regular testifying witness for the litigation industry. [read post]
4 Jan 2018, 10:04 am
”1 Rost v. [read post]
22 Sep 2008, 12:00 pm
Respondents relied on Rust v. [read post]
4 Nov 2018, 10:56 am
Clapp’s methodology and conclusions to be deemed sufficiently reliable to be admissible under Rule 702. [read post]
25 Feb 2009, 10:21 pm
The only judge to review the rules so far, Judge Frederick Scullin, Jr. sitting in the Northern District of New York in Alexander v. [read post]
18 Oct 2010, 12:06 pm
Clapp & Dorothy G. [read post]
26 Aug 2011, 11:18 pm
Related Posts: Trademark Attorney Ponders Parody — Yankees v Evil Enterprises LIKE Controversy? [read post]
4 Mar 2012, 9:02 am
Clapp & David Ozonoff, “Environment and Health: Vital Intersection or Contested Territory? [read post]
27 Jun 2019, 10:51 am
Clapp, 135 N.C. [read post]
5 Apr 2021, 3:48 am
One is New York’s common-law dissolution doctrine as ratified by the Court of Appeals’ 1963 ruling in Leibert v Clapp, authorizing courts to adjudicate a minority shareholder’s non-statutory cause of action for judicial dissolution where the majority shareholders “have so palpably breached the fiduciary duty they owe to the minority shareholders that they are disqualified from exercising the exclusive discretion and the dissolution power given to them by… [read post]
8 Jul 2012, 10:58 am
See Cook v. [read post]
26 Sep 2016, 3:08 am
As to the Ninth Cause of Action for common-law dissolution, Justice Singh’s analysis began with the key quotation from an old but still leading New York case on the subject, Leibert v Clapp, 13 NY2d 313 [1963], in which the state’s highest court wrote that common-law dissolution is available where: the directors and majority shareholders ‘have so palpably breached the fiduciary duty they owe to the minority shareholders that they are… [read post]
18 Mar 2011, 10:04 am
Wheelahan v. [read post]
21 Jul 2011, 10:38 am
Todd Ingram of Clapp, Ingram & Olheiser, P.C., Casper, WyomingRepresenting Appellee (Petitioner): Keith R. [read post]
13 Jan 2020, 4:06 am
Busher v Barry The question of first impression was addressed by S.D.N.Y. [read post]
